Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

freetype-devel (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Oct 31 2005 14:41:11 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• October 31, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 14:41
• October 28, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [4], George Williams, 18:40
  • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [4], Ulrich, 17:38
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [2], George Williams, 17:06
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Sean McBride, 10:26
  • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [2], Ulrich, 06:54
  • Re: [ft-devel] Question on glyph outline rendering for openType, Werner LEMBERG, 04:04
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 03:52
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Turner, David, 03:39
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 01:16
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Masatake YAMATO, 00:39
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, George Williams, 00:34
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 00:12
• October 27, 2005
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Steven Johnson, 20:37
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, George Williams, 20:34
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Werner LEMBERG, 17:57
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Werner LEMBERG, 17:56
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., sunmoon1997, 17:43
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 17:33
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Werner LEMBERG, 17:28
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Steven Johnson, 13:38
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Christian Demmer, 10:39
  • [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 07:20
  • RE: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., Turner, David, 05:36
  • RE: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Turner, David, 03:36
• October 26, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., sunmoon1997, 22:03
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., Chia-I Wu, 21:08
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 17:27
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., Werner LEMBERG, 17:01
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Werner LEMBERG, 16:42
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 16:14
  • [ft-devel] Question on glyph outline rendering for openType, sachidanand, 16:09
  • [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., sunmoon1997, 16:09
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Werner LEMBERG, 16:08
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault in FT_Get_Kerning ifndef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, Werner LEMBERG, 14:38
  • [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 13:32
• October 25, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), Sean McBride, 11:26
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), mpsuzuki, 11:12
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), Sean McBride, 10:35
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), mpsuzuki, 05:54
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), Werner LEMBERG, 05:43
• October 24, 2005
  • [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), mpsuzuki, 23:34
• October 21, 2005
  • [ft-devel] Segfault in FT_Get_Kerning ifndef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, Tony J. Ibbs, 08:40
  • RE: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Turner, David, 03:27
• October 20, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 18:31
  • [ft-devel] otf2bdf 3.0 - second preview version, Mark Leisher, 18:18
  • Re: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Werner LEMBERG, 15:57
• October 19, 2005
  • RE: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, George Williams, 20:01
  • RE: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Fujinaka, Todd, 19:42
• October 18, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, Werner LEMBERG, 02:48
• October 17, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 18:44
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, David Turner, 18:37
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 18:31
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 17:58
  • RE: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 17:58
  • Re: [ft-devel] font file converter, James Cloos, 17:56
  • Re: [ft-devel] font file converter, George Williams, 17:41
  • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, David Turner, 17:26
  • Re: [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, David Turner, 17:20
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, David Turner, 17:18
  • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, George Williams, 17:10
  • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Werner LEMBERG, 17:08
  • [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 16:48
  • RE: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 12:53
  • RE: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 12:12
  • Re: [ft-devel] font file converter, Werner LEMBERG, 11:37
  • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Werner LEMBERG, 11:31
  • [ft-devel] font file converter, Mark DeVries, 11:25
  • [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 10:22
  • RE: [ft-devel] Export services?, Turner, David, 10:08
  • [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, Matthias Clasen, 00:14
• October 16, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Structure Viewer for TTF files, Masatake YAMATO, 15:26
• October 15, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Werner LEMBERG, 02:13
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Werner LEMBERG, 02:10
  • Re: [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, David Turner, 02:01
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, David Turner, 02:01
  • Re: [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, Werner LEMBERG, 01:47
• October 14, 2005
  • RE: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Fujinaka, Todd, 20:04
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Chia-I Wu, 18:43
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Chia-I Wu, 17:55
  • Re: [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, Werner LEMBERG, 16:06
  • Re: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Werner LEMBERG, 16:06
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Werner LEMBERG, 16:06
  • [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Fujinaka, Todd, 12:20
  • [ft-devel] Export services?, Chia-I Wu, 11:03
  • [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, Kiran Mahajan, 09:57
• October 13, 2005
  • [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, Matthias Clasen, 13:33
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 11:06
• October 12, 2005
  • FW: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Fujinaka, Todd, 13:25
  • RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Turner, David, 07:35
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Werner LEMBERG, 07:10
  • Re: [ft-devel] Compilation fixes for FreeType on BeOS, Werner LEMBERG, 07:10
• October 11, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Compilation fixes for FreeType on BeOS, Christian Biesinger, 16:12
• October 10, 2005
  • RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, George Williams, 20:33
  • RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Fujinaka, Todd, 19:37
• October 08, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [1], George Williams, 10:04
  • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [1], Ulrich, 04:52
• October 07, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, George Williams, 17:17
  • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Banginwar, Rajesh, 14:22
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 14:06
• October 06, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Lars Knoll, 09:16
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 09:08
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Frederic Crozat, 07:56
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 07:39
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Behdad Esfahbod, 05:54
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 04:44
  • Re: [ft-devel] Illegal cff font, Werner LEMBERG, 01:44
• October 05, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Illegal cff font, George Williams, 18:10
  • [ft-devel] Illegal cff font, George Williams, 14:36
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to determine if patented hinting is enabled?, Werner LEMBERG, 11:18
• October 04, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Digital signatures, David Somers, 11:08
  • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Werner LEMBERG, 06:34
  • Re: [ft-devel] Digital signatures, Werner LEMBERG, 02:41
• October 03, 2005
  • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 23:46
  • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, mpsuzuki, 20:27
  • [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 14:31
  • [ft-devel] How to determine if patented hinting is enabled?, Huw D M Davies, 10:56
  • Re: [ft-devel] Digital signatures, Martin Hosken, 01:35

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc