[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:25:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Petr Hluzín wrote:
> To save others from searching: the new site seems to be at
> http://avrs.sourceforge.net/
I don't see any point in starting yet another project on it, but if it
makes you lucky, then do so. You could as well had a Git repository
in the Savannah project instead.
> * there are patches in the tracker that were not commited or
> rejected or otherwise taken care
I already said it before: *you* (whoever this "you" actually is, I
don't want to exclude anyone by that) are the developers, so *you* are
responsible for resolving the bugs, nobody else. I'm an administrator
here, yes, but that doesn't mean I would be patching a CVS tree that
is not even used by the developers at all. That would just be a waste
of time. And: I've only inherited that administrtorship, but I'm not
a project developer, and don't want to be one. (And frankly, I never
got the hang of Git. Tried it, but I simply don't understand the
concepts behind it without studying a bunch of documentation first.)
So if you feel the Sourceforge project is the way to go: be it.
Personally, I think Sourceforge is overloaded with lots of
Spam^H^H^H^HAdvertisement, much harder to navigate than Savannah, and
quite frequently runs into performance issues in the web interface.
But again: a fork is nonsense, in my opinion. It leaves users with
more confusion than necessary.
> * nobody responded to proposal [1] to give someone access to fix
> some of the above
You (at least some of you) know me pretty well, so you could have
written me a personal email, asking for access. I simply haven't been
able to follow all the discussions.
Also, there's a knob on the Savannah web interface people who want to
join a project could press, leaving a short explanation about their
intentions as a project member. So far, there's just a single pending
request (by Colin Coombs, but I've never read that name before, nor
could I remember having seen the email from his request, it probably
predates the time when I became a project admin). There's no request
filed by Onno, none by Petr, none by anybody else. Sorry, but you
couldn't have been all that serious about your request then either.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, ThomasK, 2010/03/17
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Petr Hluzín, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Weddington, Eric, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/19
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Weddington, Eric, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Petr Hluzín, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Petr Hluzín, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Onno Kortmann, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Onno Kortmann, 2010/03/19
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/03/20
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] Simulavrxx fork started, Weddington, Eric, 2010/03/20