[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.or
From: |
Bradley M. Kuhn |
Subject: |
Re: Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org) |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:23:35 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
> > BTW, if you find a project that looks like it might be GNU but there is
> > ambiguous information, please email <address@hidden> and let us know.
> > We'll DTRT to figure out what's going on.
address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is this the cannonical address ? I thought this should be sent to
> address@hidden
Yes. I have been trying to sort out address@hidden into different addresses
for different purposes. Anything having to do with maintaining a GNU
package, or who the maintainer is should go to <address@hidden>.
pgpTEuDHsBrgD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org, Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/03/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org, Hugo Gayosso, 2001/03/14
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org, Mark H. Weaver, 2001/03/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org, Brian Youmans, 2001/03/15
- Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org, loic, 2001/03/15
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org), Bradley M. Kuhn, 2001/03/16
- Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org), loic, 2001/03/17
- Re: Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org), Richard Stallman, 2001/03/17
- Re: Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org), loic, 2001/03/18
- Re: Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org), Richard Stallman, 2001/03/19
- Re: Is a program really GNU? (was Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: www.gnu.org),
Bradley M. Kuhn <=