[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: Paul Fox
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:27:19 -0400

ken wrote:
 > >> Thoughts?  I realize this is a significant behavior change
 > >
 > >+1.  The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in
 > >addition to the existing `Attach'.  Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if
 > >the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the
 > >time?
 > Sigh.  I think when we hashed this out last time, the (rough) consensus
 > was that not puttting in a "Nmh-" prefix was fine.  Attach had prior
 > art (I think mutt used it), and Forward seems to be similarly named.

i vote for presenting the user with a user-friendly component name.
if conflict is an issue, could we make the names of these "special"
headers tuneable via a profile entry?
    Nmh-Attach-Component: Attach
    Nmh-Forward-Component: Forward

 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 45.1 degrees)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]