[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: David Levine
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:49 -0400

Ralph wrote:

> +1.  The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in
> addition to the existing `Attach'.  Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if
> the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the
> time?

Absolutely.  The existing code allows either Nmh-Attach or Attach.
We should use only Nmh-Forward here.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]