[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:01:56 -0400

>> Thoughts?  I realize this is a significant behavior change
>+1.  The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in
>addition to the existing `Attach'.  Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if
>the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the

Sigh.  I think when we hashed this out last time, the (rough) consensus
was that not puttting in a "Nmh-" prefix was fine.  Attach had prior
art (I think mutt used it), and Forward seems to be similarly named.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]