[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:29:02 +0100

Hi Ken,

>    mhbuild will still handle #forw directives in case someone wants to
>    have exact control over their message content.


> 4) After 1.7 comes out, Jon Steinhart will send a message to
> nmh-workers asking why forw doesn't work anymore :-) (I'm sorry, I
> couldn't resist).

After 1.9.

> Thoughts?  I realize this is a significant behavior change

+1.  The `Forward' header is grabbing another one for nmh's use, in
addition to the existing `Attach'.  Should we be using `Nmh-Forward' if
the user isn't likely to have the hassle of typing them most of the

Cheers, Ralph.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]