[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Changes to forw(1)
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:26:18 -0400

>Because the sooner we create the prefix, the sooner future new headers
>can fall under it.  Ken says we discussed this over `Attach'.  Here we
>are for `Forward'.  Next year it will be another one?

I am going on prior art here; specifically, Fcc.  I don't see the value
in adding an Nmh- prefix to any Nmh-specific header.  I realize this is
something that there is not universal agreement on.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]