[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again

From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 22:18:26 -0700

On Oct 24, 2013, at 10:13 PM, chad <address@hidden> wrote:

> Beyond that, email messages are generally large (compared to calendar 
> entries, anyway) collections of text. Changes to messages mostly involve 
> small deltas to metadata. Managing changes to changes to changes based on 
> revisions and times isn’t trivial, but a lot of the automation (conceptually) 
> has already been written.

I would really like to see evidence of this claim.  My experience of 
manipulating email messages says otherwise.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]