[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 18:10:14 -0700 |
> I completely agree. And like you said, teaching MH about IMAP is
> a huge job.
Been there, done it ;-)
>
> The sync algorithm is explained here:
>
> http://offlineimap.org/howitworks.html
But that describes a simple 1:1 mapping case. Nothing there says the proof
extends to the 1:n mapping case (i.e. multiple clients).
--lyndon
- [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Joel Uckelman, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Earl Hood, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/27