[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:17:32 -0400

>But that describes a simple 1:1 mapping case.  Nothing there says the
>proof extends to the 1:n mapping case (i.e. multiple clients).

Fair enough ... I'm just trying to imagine exactly a) what "conflicting"
clients would be doing, exactly, to conflict, and b) what SHOULD happen
when a conflict occurs.  As I understand it, the messages are immutable,
so there's no issue in terms of two clients changing a message.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]