[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again

From: Lyndon Nerenberg
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:32:17 -0700

On Oct 28, 2013, at 8:35 AM, address@hidden wrote:

> Hmm.. so 'anno' is a complete loss then?  I'd be screwed if I didn't have
> a way to add 'Replied:' headers....

With a basic 3501 server, yes.

However, if the IMAP server supports the ANNOTATE extension (RFC5257), it 
should be possible to support almost all of anno(1).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]