[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 14:41:29 -0400 |
>It seems to me there are two IMAP-related things people have wanted:
>
> 1) Have nmh commands act on IMAP-stored messages.
>
> 2) Expose an nmh folder via IMAP.
>
>#1 would let you use nmh against arbitrary IMAP accounts. #2 would
>let you access your existing nmh storage over IMAP. I think both would
>be neat, but the one I really want is #2.
>
>I looked this over a bit and wasn't able to satisfy myself as to what
>OfflineIMAP would do.
It would (if you added nmh folder support, which doesn't look like it would
be hard) get #1.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Joel Uckelman, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Earl Hood, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Ken Hornstein, 2013/10/24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/10/25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP, again, chad, 2013/10/25