[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:)
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 01:49:27 +0300 (MSK) |
23-Nov-99 20:03 Klaus Weide wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:
> [kw:]
>> > It is not true. Not when the forms options page is not used.
I think this will only complicate things even more:
there are many places in docs where we assume form-based menu
without explicit note - options_help.html explain the latter
so old-style menu userse may be surprized one day.
We could not even agree on the naming of two types of option menus...
IMHO, those who use old-style menu know that they are doing
since this is not the default way any more.
'g LYNXCFG:' is not the most comfortable way, just when you haven't another
(or you are fairly avdanced lynx user which is not a default assumption).
>> To view your current configuration derived from lynx.cfg and any
>> included configuration files, press <em>'g'</em> and type in
>> '<em>lynxcfg:</em>'. If you are using the forms-based <em>Options
>> Menu</em>, you may press <em>'o'</em> for the Options Menu and follow
>> the '<em>Check your lynx.cfg</em>' link near the bottom.
> I prefer the second one. If 'g' 's gonna be the main way, it should
> come first.
> I would write LYNXCFG: instead of lynxcfg:.
agree here.
> This again brings up the question what exactly to call the Option Menus or
> pages or screens. Have you converged on something? If yes, could you
> summarize?
> Klaus
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/21
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/21
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/24
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/24