[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:)
From: |
Henry Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 11:48:23 +0900 (JST) |
> which comes in 2 flavors, `Key-based' & `Forms-based'.
^^^^^^^^^
Thanks for reminding me. "Key" seems intuitive ("more than fixed
fields"). No need to respond to my request in the previous post.
> i argued that `Options Menu' is a tautology.
I think for historical reasons, if nothing else, it would be better
to stick with `Options Menu' and just add modifiers to that when
necessary.
__Henry
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), (continued)
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:),
Henry Nelson <=
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/24