[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:)
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:) |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 14:14:59 +0300 (MSK) |
> On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Henry Nelson wrote:
>> > > is the case. Futher documenting of 'g lynxcompileopts:' seems excessive.]
>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> > Except if there is an expectations that anyone should actually
>> > do what the Configuration Definitions page says:
>> >
>> > "When reporting a bug, please include a copy of this page."
We could improve lynx-dev.html and/or other parts of the documentation
where "reporting a problem" procedure is described.
> I don't find it very efficient to repeat a simple question like
> "Which version of lynx are you using?" again and again and again.
> Or "Is you lynx compile with slang or curses" (which many users don't
> know how to find out).
> Klaus
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/21
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/21
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/24
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev LYNXCFG:, LYNXCOMPILEOPTS:), Henry Nelson, 1999/11/24