Re: New context modifier \CompletionRhythms?

[David Kastrup]

Dan Eble <address@hidden> writes:

> On Apr 1, 2016, at 17:59 , Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>> the current syntax, as well as more concise. Another consideration
>> would be \CompletionRhythmsOn, but OTOH when would anybody need to
>> turn it _off_?
>
> Well,
>
> Are there any known issues that make this feature annoying in certain
> cases? any undesirable interactions with other options that are off by
> default?
>
> Does it always do the right thing with multi-measure rests?  Does it
> work during cadenzas?  Across staff changes (manual or automatic)?
> With \partcombine?  etc.
>
> In other words, is this feature mature?

No.  If you take a look at the code and history as compared with the
normal engravers, updates to them have not been copied to the completion
engravers.

-- 
David Kastrup