[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Two notes sharing a head
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Two notes sharing a head |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:41:52 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> >
> > It's still in flux, and we appreciate comments about how we can make
> > it easier to navigate.
>
> For this particular example, you won't find the answer clicking on
> Collision_engraver. Try to click on note-column-interface.
> Why isn't this information included in the documentation of
> NoteColumn?
Because listing unset properties generates huge pages that all look
alike. I think it is better to have most information in screen-sized
chunks.
> The table of contents looks really weird for the
> contexts. A search facility and back-links from interfaces
> to elements would make it slightly more easy to navigate,
> but you still more or less have to now the answer to be able
> to find the documentation.
I added links leading from ElementName to all the interfaces it
supports. I especially added a link from note-collision-interface to
note-column-interface (modulo typing error), and a link back. I don't
really understand why you think the information is hard to find.
> (I still don't understand why the different interfaces have to
> be visible in the user documentation.)
Why do the different interfacess have to be invisible in the user
documentation?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
Re: Two notes sharing a head, POLCHER Jan, 2000/11/13
Re: Two notes sharing a head, POLCHER Jan, 2000/11/13
Clefs in 108 ?, POLCHER Jan, 2000/11/21