[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website
From: |
hellekin |
Subject: |
Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:09:04 -0300 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 06/08/2013 02:53 PM, Luis Guzman wrote:
> El jue, 06-06-2013 a las 21:50 +0200, Michał Masłowski escribió:
>>> 3. The items that ship with proprietary software pre-installed
>>> (laptops and routers, not sure if there are other categories)
>>> should say something along the lines of
>>>
>>> =============================================================================
>>>
>>>
This device ships with proprietary software pre-installed. It can be
upgraded
>>> to free software, which is why it is listed on h-node.org.
>>> =============================================================================
>>
>>
>>>
This isn't necessarily true: not on all laptops users reporting them
>> have successfully installed a free operating system,
>> implementations of restricted boot might prevent it (e.g. in
>> future when there will be ARM systems supported by free distros).
>> The "can free operating systems be installed?" field was added
>> for this, so users know what laptops to avoid. Should the second
>> sentence be shown only if this field is set to "yes"?
>
> As Michał mention before, there is the "can free operating systems
> be installed?" field, besides, most of the manufactures changes
> the software on different regions, so there is no standard for
> that.
>
> Once, in a Peruvian supermarket, i found a model of notebooks that
> we're sold with a customized GNU/Linux distro, it was a non-free
> one, at that point is easy to change it for any distro free or non
> free, maybe we could change the first statement with; "Can the
> pre-installed proprietary OS be replaced with a free one?" - Yes -
> No - Comes with a free OS
>
*** There's also the case of hardware sold without an OS
pre-installed. So that should read:
"Can the pre-installed proprietary OS, if any, be replaced with a free
one?"
- - Yes
- - No
- - Comes without a proprietary OS
- - Comes with a free OS
But that does not take into account the variety of models: some
laptops come with Windows pre-installed, but the manufacturer offers
an alternate Ubuntu version. As far as the FSF is concerned, that does
not make much of a difference, but for h-node users it can make a
great deal of a difference: if a company sells with a GNU/Linux OS
pre-installed, even one with binary blobs, that's already a good
indication that the hardware will probably be able to run a free OS.
The rationale here is that there's a lot of laptops that come with
freedom-compatible hardware-but-the-wifi-chip (aka a Bronze device in
h-node).
Using a good computer without a wifi chip is doable, whereas using a
low-end computer with free wifi might come as a secondary choice.
I.e., it can be cheaper to use a ThinkPad with a free USB Wifi device,
or change the builtin wifi chip of a laptop rather than boycott the
whole thing because of a single device that is not mandatory.
Moreover, registering an interest from consumers for a certain model
might help build pressure over manufacturers to provide alternate
models, shipping with free Wifi devices, or help get someone to write
the missing free drivers.
Cheers,
==
hk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/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=OQmh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, (continued)
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, Michał Masłowski, 2013/06/06
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, Antonio Gallo, 2013/06/25
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, Antonio Gallo, 2013/06/25
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, Michał Masłowski, 2013/06/25
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, Antonio Gallo, 2013/06/26
- Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website,
hellekin <=
Re: [H-source-users] changes to the h-node.org website, Antonio Gallo, 2013/06/25