Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source

[Andrew Suffield]

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 09:44:35AM +0400, Dmitriy Nikitinskiy wrote:
> Miles Bader wrote:
> >2005/7/12, nick <address@hidden>:
> >
> >>Wow. Mercurial really rocks!
> >>They repository consume less space (2,069,732)  than tla-1.x (2,994,487)
> >>and revc (14,498,601) on same data.
> >>It's faster than revc on same data.
> >
> >
> >Can you comment on my impression that mercurial[*] seems to lack
> >useful rename support?  When I tried it, it treated renames as
> >add+delete (which screws up merging).
> >
> >If true, it's a fatal flaw I think.
> >
> >[*] I earlier referred to it incorrectly as "mercury".
> 
> I show this timings generally for Arch developers.
> Why _small_ (distrib size 81760 bytes!), written on python
> SCM with compressed delta format of repository faster than
> written on C with snapshot based repository?

Because to for answer the questions did not you.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature