gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source


From: Andy Tai
Subject: Re: [GNU-arch-dev] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:31:59 -0700 (PDT)

clarification:  my last sentence means "whatever the
worth of Microsoft Windows"

--- Andy Tai <address@hidden> wrote:

> The second time the build succeeds as suggested. 
> make
> test fails with the following under cygwin:
> .
> .
> .
> for s in
>
/cygdrive/c/users/atai/work/revc/revc-0.0x0/hackerlab/tests/unidata-tests/unit-unidata.sh
> ; do \
>   /bin/sh $s; \
> done
> ================ unit-unidata test ================
> pruning unidata.txt
> printing hackerlab db
> comparing results
> ,tmp ,tmp2 differ: char 20, line 1
> make[3]: *** [tests-timestamp] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
>
`/cygdrive/c/users/atai/work/revc/revc-0.0x0/build/hackerlab/tests/unidata-tests'
> make[2]: *** [test] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory
>
`/cygdrive/c/users/atai/work/revc/revc-0.0x0/build/hackerlab/tests'
> make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory
>
`/cygdrive/c/users/atai/work/revc/revc-0.0x0/build/hackerlab'
> make: *** [test] Error 2
> 
> 
> For whatever its worth, the arch 2.0 implementation
> has a good start toward being usable on the
> Microsoft
> Windows platform.  
> 
> --- John A Meinel <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Matthew Hannigan wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 03:48:35AM -0700, Andy
> Tai
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >>[ ... ]
> > >>cc -o ,es -g ,es.c
> > >>./,es > exit-status.h
> > >>rm ,es ,es.c
> > >>rm: cannot remove `,es': No such file or
> directory
> > >>make[2]: *** [exit-status.h] Error 1
> > >>make[2]: Leaving directory
> >
>
>>`/cygdrive/c/users/atai/work/revc/revc-0.0x0/build/hackerlab/os'
> > >>.....
> > You also can just run "make" a second time,
> because
> > the second time it
> > doesn't worry about the ,es target.
> > 
> > John
> > =:->
> > 
> >
> 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]