[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:36:41 +0900 |
2005/7/12, nick <address@hidden>:
> Wow. Mercurial really rocks!
> They repository consume less space (2,069,732) than tla-1.x (2,994,487)
> and revc (14,498,601) on same data.
> It's faster than revc on same data.
Can you comment on my impression that mercurial[*] seems to lack
useful rename support? When I tried it, it treated renames as
add+delete (which screws up merging).
If true, it's a fatal flaw I think.
[*] I earlier referred to it incorrectly as "mercury".
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, nick, 2005/07/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Thomas Lord, 2005/07/10
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Bruce Stephens, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Rob Browning, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Rob Browning, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, nick, 2005/07/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Dmitriy Nikitinskiy, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Andrew Suffield, 2005/07/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Clark McGrew, 2005/07/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Miles Bader, 2005/07/12
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Robin Green, 2005/07/10
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: [GNU-arch-dev] GNU Arch 2.0 -- first source, Andrea Russo, 2005/07/10