[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion
From: |
Johannes Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:43:20 +0200 |
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 07:06, Martin Pool wrote:
> On the
> other hand, it is only 0.1% of my very ordinary 70GB disk, so I don't
> think it matters very much.
Bah. I hate it when people say that. For the record, I'm doing all
development (even tla/win32) on a box with 20GB. This stuff is a
significant overhead for me, especially if I want to use a revision
library (and really, I need to, pristines even larger)
johannes
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, mbp, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robin Farine, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion,
Johannes Berg <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robert Collins, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Harald Meland, 2004/04/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/16