[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion
From: |
Martin Pool |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:44:23 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On 16 Apr 2004, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> (2) Don't bloat up your disk with tons of small-files-that-the-file-
> system-makes-large (and even if _you_ use reiserfs or whatever,
> consider your other developers -- some of who might be stuck using
> ext2).
Of course since you will usually have a whole second copy of the tree
as a pristine or library, the cost of the ids will usually be
relatively small.
> BTW, points 1 - 3 are to some degree dependent on the current
> implementation of explicit tags used in tla; for instance, changing to a
> representation that used a single file per directory to hold explicit tags
> would improve things quite a bit.
I rather like that id files can be simply renamed, deleted, etc
without needing to actually edit a file. Amongst other things, it
means a changeset that modifies them can still be well represented as
a diff.
> However there doesn't appear to be any rush to change the
> implementation.
Perhaps in the future, as disks get smaller, it will be a more
pressing problem. ;-)
--
Martin
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Matthieu Moy, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion,
Martin Pool <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, mbp, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robin Farine, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Johannes Berg, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robert Collins, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16