[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion |
Date: |
09 Apr 2004 15:37:47 +0900 |
Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
> I added a little flame about implicit tagging to the wiki:
> http://wiki.gnuarch.org/moin.cgi/ID_2dtagging_20methods
>
> I just thought I'd give implicit proponents a chance to respond :)
By "implicit", I assume you mean "tagline".
You know you that `tla mv' works with taglines too, right?
[and of course you can also just always `mv' always and then use a tool
like `tla-update-ids' before committing.]
You're gonna get occasional annoyances no matter _which_ method you use,
so the question is not `Which one is perfect?' (none of them are), but
`Which one is the least annoying?'. From my personal experience I'd say
that tagline is definitely the least problematic.
If your tree is chock-full of binary files which you keep moving around,
I guess you're going to have get in the habit of using `tla mv' (or some
other tool), but taglines don't cramp that style. Might as well use
taglines anyway for their other benefits.
-Miles
--
80% of success is just showing up. --Woody Allen
- [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Matthieu Moy, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16