[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/auto
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:12:09 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux) |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
Tom> You can arrange coordination with good tools.
Nonsense. There is excellent reason to believe there are essential
limits, though I know of no proof. Coordination without hierarchy
requires communication which is exponential in the number of
participants, or a market structure which free software inherently
foregoes. Sure, you can design better structures for general
communication, but design implies hierarchy (ie, at least a central
architectural authority), and the ones I know of require some form of
central control.
It's possible that there are efficient decentralized mechanisms which
will evolve that are not market-structured, but none are known at
present. Take BitTorrent, for example. The author claims it's a
tit-for-tat kind of mechanism (a la Axelrod _The Evolution of
Cooperation_), but it is not.[1] It looks much more like a matching
market. (Osborne and Rubinstein, _Bargaining in Markets_, is quite
readable, and the math, while skippable, is pretty elementary.)
Footnotes:
[1] Yes, it's tit-for-tat in the common parlance, but it doesn't have
the same strategic properties---choking is not really punishment, it's
abandoning a current partner with known poor value of cooperation in
favor of a random value with higher expected mean. Tit-for-tat's
strategic properties depend on "lock-in" to a specific partner.
--
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Andrew Suffield, 2004/04/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Robin Green, 2004/04/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/04/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Andrew Suffield, 2004/04/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Tom Lord, 2004/04/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/04/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Miles Bader, 2004/04/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Tom Lord, 2004/04/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Tom Lord, 2004/04/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Tom Lord, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Tom Lord, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] ping by request of jblack, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/04/06
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Managing changes to projects that use autoconf/automake with tla, Robert Collins, 2004/04/06