[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history
From: |
Johannes Berg |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Apr 2004 10:18:17 +0200 |
On Fri, 2004-04-02 at 05:40, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> You mean when you get 1.2, it doesn't get 1.1?
I haven't tested that, no, I was saying when I got 1.3 it doesn't get
1.1
> Off the top of my head, it's probably related to the presence or absence
> of cached revisions.
No, thats the weird thing.
> 1.3 doesn't have any cached revisions, so it's necessary to use 1.2.
> 1.2 has a cacherev at base-0, so 1.1 isn't needed.
1.3 does have a cacherev at base-0
johannes
--
http://www.sipsolutions.de/
Key-ID: 9AB78CA5 Johannes Martin Berg <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Johannes Berg, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, David Allouche, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, David Allouche, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Tom Lord, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, David Allouche, 2004/04/08
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about greedy library and history, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/08