[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities |
Date: |
26 Feb 2003 10:58:17 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
>>>>> "Julian" == Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:
Julian> But LibxmlJ works fine for Gjdoc, it's fast as hell compared
Julian> to Xalan, and AFAICT it's the only way to wrap the latest
Julian> JAXP-only Gjdoc into an executable, because Xalan doesn't play
Julian> nicely with gcj.
There's a version of Xalan in rhug (so it must be compilable with
gcj). I don't follow this stuff too closely. Is that an older
version or something?
Julian> On the bright side, and not surprisingly, gcj-compiled Java using
Julian> libxml/libxslt for XML processing is RAT fast and seems to exhibit
Julian> a low memory footprint compared to Xalan or other pure-Java
Julian> solutions.
Sounds nice.
Tom
- [Classpathx-discuss] LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities,
Tom Tromey <=
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/27
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/27
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, David Brownell, 2003/02/25