[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Classpathx-discuss] LibxmlJ formalities
From: |
Julian Scheid |
Subject: |
[Classpathx-discuss] LibxmlJ formalities |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:43:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 |
I've started writing a JAXP-compliant wrapper for Libxml2/Libxslt
which goes by the name LibxmlJ. More on the capabilities and
limitations of the wrapper in another post.
As discussed before on the Cp-tools list, I want to donate this piece
to ClasspathX. I'd be ready to check in a preliminary version now,
let me just get some formalities out of the way.
I want to transfer copyright to the FSF. I've already signed papers
for Classpath, I assume it is not necessary to do this again for
Classpath"X"?
I have chosen `gnu.xml.libxmlj' as package root for this project,
`gnu.xml.libxmlj.transform' as package name for the XSL transformation
part, and I'll use `libxmlj' as CVS module name. OK?
Julian
- [Classpathx-discuss] LibxmlJ formalities,
Julian Scheid <=
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/26
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26