Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities

[David Brownell]

> > I have chosen `gnu.xml.libxmlj' as package root for this project,
> > `gnu.xml.libxmlj.transform' as package name for the XSL transformation
> > part, and I'll use `libxmlj' as CVS module name. OK?
>
>
> That's great.

Yep -- a fine thing to have.  I've never been a rabid believer in
"100% Pure Java", and javax.xml.transform using libxslt sounds like
like it should be good.  How does that compare (speed and memory)
with the typical 100% pure implementations?

- db