[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities |
Date: |
26 Feb 2003 13:30:48 +0000 |
Julian Scheid <address@hidden> writes:
> Because URIResolver is essential but the appropriate Libxml hook
> doesn't provide context, I'm currently using an ugly workaround
> involving global variables, which effectively is why LibxmlJ has a
> single-thread bottleneck. This is the first issue I will talk about
> with Daniel, I'll be happy to include you in the discussion.
Yeah, cool.
I think it should be easy to frig something dirty with Thread
context attributes. I'll take a look at what you've done.
Nic
- [Classpathx-discuss] LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/25
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities,
Nic Ferrier <=
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/26
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Julian Scheid, 2003/02/26
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Nic Ferrier, 2003/02/27
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, Tom Tromey, 2003/02/27
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: LibxmlJ formalities, David Brownell, 2003/02/25