Re: [Chicken-hackers] Egg filename versioning

[Graham Fawcett]

On Feb 12, 2008 12:25 PM, Leonardo Valeri Manera
<address@hidden> wrote:
> > OK. If you believe the load on the CGI will be reasonably low, then
> > keep using it for now. Our university has fat pipes, it's just that
> > they might not appreciate a DDOS. ;-) If I understand you correctly,
> > you have a few systems that will grab eggs and prepare them as gentoo
> > packages, so the CGI won't be pounded on by hundreds of users.
> > Correct?
>
> Well, there aren't /that/ many users to the overlay...
>
> Once they hit the main tree, they'll get mirrored on a few (heh)
> mirrors around the world ;)
> See http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/mirrors2.xml

Ah, I see. OK, let's leave it as-is for now, and we can revisit in a
month or so. If we move the CGI, I can always put a redirect in place
to send unsuspecting users there instead.

G