[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks
From: |
Daniel Jensen |
Subject: |
[bongo-devel] Re: Marks |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:19:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>
>> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>>>
>>>> Or we could do it the Gnus way with a stack for saving
>>>> sets of marks.
>>>
>>> Does _that_ have any use cases?
>>
>> I don't know, really. Maybe the step from saving one set
>> of marks to saving a stack of sets is not that great.
>
> I suppose so. Then `U' would push and `C-u U' pop?
I don't think it is a good idea to mix unmarking with a stack growing
behind the scenes, that's messy. Better to let the user manage this
stack separately. How about `* k', `* y' and `* w', kind of like in
Gnus? That is, if we want the stack after all.
> Dired doesn't define `* i' at all, so I guess `* t' was
> their first choice. On the other hand, Gnus has this,
>
> `M P i'
> Invert the list of process marked articles
> (`gnus-uu-invert-processable').
>
> and I think `invert' is a better term than `toggle'.
Invert it is, then. If we go with the stack commands, it is also
consistent with that in the Gnus-wannabe way.
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, (continued)
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/03
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/04
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/05
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/06
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/07
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/08
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/08
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks,
Daniel Jensen <=
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/13
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12