[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks
From: |
Daniel Brockman |
Subject: |
Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:32:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
> Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> address@hidden (Daniel Jensen) writes:
>>
>>> a) we should leave the marks after commands (customizable),
>>
>> Why? I think in the most common use case, you will mark
>> some tracks, run some command on them, and then no longer
>> care about the marking. That suggests that the default
>> behavior should be to have commands "use up" the marking.
>
> Ah well, that was my original plan. I must be tired,
Who could blame you, really, at 5:20 AM?
I feel like sleeping a bit myself, to tell you the truth.
> because I thought you wanted the marks there like they are now.
> Let's change that one to "we should remove the marks after
> commands" then.
Okay, good.
>>> c) Unmarking all saves the marks, or we can have a separate command.
>>> d) We use the `* *' command because it's handy.
>>
>> Having an unmark all command separate from `* *' would
>> be redundant, I think.
>
> Other commands would unmark everything, that was
> what I meant.
Are you talking about commands like `e' here?
> I agree it's a little redundant (but sometimes it's good
> to have more than one way to do things.)
I won't argue with that, except to say that it's more useful
to have more than one way to do something the more different
the different ways actually are.
>>> I'm profiling the code, and I see bottlenecks in
>>> `bongo-line-internal-infoset' and `bongo-line-get-property'.
>>> The latter is called a lot of times all over the place.
>>> We could use a little optimization here.
>>
>> Interesting.
>
> I don't have a plan for this now, though.
That's okay. We're moving pretty fast, so now might not be
the optimal time for optimizing anyway.
Aren't I in a fun mood?
--
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, (continued)
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/09
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/09
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks,
Daniel Brockman <=
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/13
- Re: [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Brockman, 2007/02/12
- [bongo-devel] Re: Marks, Daniel Jensen, 2007/02/12