[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive |
Date: |
27 Jan 2005 16:00:38 +0100 |
Braden McDaniel writes:
>> @version is an internal field of the archive;
> If that were true, it would be in a file separate from
> the macro and the user would never touch it. It's not,
> and it ain't.
How about @category?
Is that an internal field of the archive?
Peter
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Tom Howard, 2005/01/25
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/26
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive,
Peter Simons <=
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27