[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive
From: |
Braden McDaniel |
Subject: |
Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:30:05 -0500 |
On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 16:00 +0100, Peter Simons wrote:
> Braden McDaniel writes:
>
> >> @version is an internal field of the archive;
>
> > If that were true, it would be in a file separate from
> > the macro and the user would never touch it. It's not,
> > and it ain't.
>
> How about @category?
>
> Is that an internal field of the archive?
Not as long as it's in the file I submit to you and the one downloaded
by users. "Internal" things are just that: not exposed to users.
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <address@hidden>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <address@hidden>
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, (continued)
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Tom Howard, 2005/01/25
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/26
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive,
Braden McDaniel <=
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Peter Simons, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Guido Draheim, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Braden McDaniel, 2005/01/27
- Re: Policy: Versioning Macros In The Archive, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/01/27