[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point.... |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:33:19 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 22/02/02 21:33:19
Modified files:
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ml-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pot
open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ro-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po
open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.90&r2=1.91
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.65&r2=1.66
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.120&r2=1.121
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.32&r2=1.33
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.144&r2=1.145
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.72&r2=1.73
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.129&r2=1.130
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.51&r2=1.52
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.94&r2=1.95
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.96&r2=1.97
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.85&r2=1.86
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.70&r2=1.71
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.96&r2=1.97
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.75&r2=1.76
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.135&r2=1.136
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.102&r2=1.103
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.71&r2=1.72
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.89&r2=1.90
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:06 -0000
1.43
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:09 -0000
1.44
@@ -135,44 +135,51 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little <span
class="removed"><del><strong>weaker</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>looser</em></ins></span> than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>released</em></ins></span> free
software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> would
qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example, Open Watcom is
nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example,
Open Watcom is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a free program's source
code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. If these executables correspond exactly to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to
make</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>more
important,</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
-computers
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>(including many Android devices) come
with</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>check signatures on
their</em></ins></span> executable programs <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that
-correspond</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software source code, but the devices do not allow
-the user to install modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
-from installing different</em></ins></span> executables; only one
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can
-make executables that can run in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>device or can access its full
-capabilities.</em></ins></span> We call these devices
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Tivo)</em></ins></span>
-where we first saw it.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code, and nominally carries a free
license, the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more important, many
products containing computers
+(including many Android devices) come</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria for open source are concerned
solely</em></ins></span> with <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe
an</em></ins></span>
+executable <span class="removed"><del><strong>programs</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open source,” because its
source code is
+available</em></ins></span> that
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>correspond to free
software</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>way. That
causes confusion in paradoxical situations
+where the</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code is open source (and free)</em></ins></span> but
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>devices do</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code
+carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables
+carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables
+correspond exactly to the released sources—which may or
may</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>allow</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>be so—users can
compile</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>user</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>install modified versions of
those</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>make and distribute
+free executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from effectively using different</em></ins></span> executables;
only one
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can make executables that can run
in</em></ins></span> the <span class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify
them.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>device and
+use its full capabilities.</em></ins></span> We call these devices
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Tivo)</em></ins></span> where we first saw
+it.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>source code, and
+nominally carries a free license, the users cannot usefully run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
-Linux,</em></ins></span> even though <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> source code is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software. The</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
-
-<p>The</em></ins></span> criteria for open source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do not recognize this
-issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with the
-licensing of the source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not free.</p></em></ins></span>
+Linux,</em></ins></span> even though <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> source code is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software. The criteria
for</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>under GNU GPL version
2. (We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that
is</em></ins></span>
+open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do not recognize this
+issue; they</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and
free,</em></ins></span> are <span class="removed"><del><strong>concerned solely
with the licensing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the source code.</p></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open
+source,” but they are <em>not</em> free
software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -555,7 +562,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:06 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:09 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.90
retrieving revision 1.91
diff -u -b -r1.90 -r1.91
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:06 -0000 1.90
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:10 -0000 1.91
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-09-27 17:26+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafik E. Younan <rafik.younan@phoenixegypt.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <www-ar-translators@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -309,10 +309,9 @@
# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
-# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
-# | do not qualify as free licenses. {+For example, Open Watcom is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately.+} Fortunately, few programs use [-those-] {+such+} licenses.
+# | exceptions. [-First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so
+# | they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, few programs use those
+# | licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
@@ -325,11 +324,7 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"عÙ
ÙÙاÙØ ØªÙ
Ø«Ù Ù
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر Ù
عاÙÙر أضع٠Ù
Ù
اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة. عÙÙ Øد عÙÙ
ÙØ§Ø ÙÙ "
"اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة Ù
ؤÙÙØ© Ùأ٠تعتبر Ù
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر. تÙرÙبا٠Ù٠اÙبرÙ
جÙات Ù
ÙتÙØØ© "
@@ -338,23 +333,62 @@
"تÙ٠اÙرخص."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would
+# | qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software,
+# | but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source licenses are too
+# | restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. {+For example, Open
+# | Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified
+# | version and using it privately.+} Fortunately, few programs use [-those-]
+# | {+such+} licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use those licenses."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
+"عÙ
ÙÙاÙØ ØªÙ
Ø«Ù Ù
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر Ù
عاÙÙر أضع٠Ù
Ù
اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة. عÙÙ Øد عÙÙ
ÙØ§Ø ÙÙ "
+"اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة Ù
ؤÙÙØ© Ùأ٠تعتبر Ù
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر. تÙرÙبا٠Ù٠اÙبرÙ
جÙات Ù
ÙتÙØØ© "
+"اÙÙ
صدر Ù٠برÙ
جÙات ØØ±Ø©Ø ÙÙÙ ÙÙجد استثÙاءات.
Ø£ÙÙاÙØ Ø¨Ø¹Ø¶ اÙرخص اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر "
+"Ù
ÙÙدة ÙÙØرÙØ§ØªØ ÙØ°ÙÙ Ùا تؤÙÙ Ùأ٠تعد رخص
Øرة. ÙØس٠اÙØØ¸Ø Ø¨Ø±Ù
جÙات ÙÙÙÙØ© تستخدÙ
"
+"تÙ٠اÙرخص."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more important,-] {+most important in
-# | practice,+} many products containing computers [-(including many Android
-# | devices) come with-] {+check signatures on their+} executable programs
-# | [-that correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not
-# | allow the user-] to [-install modified versions of those-] {+block users
-# | from installing different+} executables; only one [-special-]
-# | {+privileged+} company [-has the power to modify them.-] {+can make
-# | executables that can run in the device or can access its full
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-more important, many-]
+# | {+important. Many+} products containing computers [-(including many
+# | Android devices) come with-] {+check signatures on their+} executable
+# | programs [-that correspond-] to [-free software source code, but the
+# | devices do not allow the user to install modified versions of those-]
+# | {+block users from effectively using different+} executables; only one
+# | [-special-] {+privileged+} company [-has-] {+can make executables that can
+# | run in+} the [-power to modify them.-] {+device and use its full
# | capabilities.+} We call these devices [-“tyrants”,-]
# | {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is called
# | “tivoization” after the product {+(Tivo)+} where we first saw
@@ -362,8 +396,8 @@
# | code-] {+Even if the executable+} is {+made from+} free [-software. The
# | criteria for open-] source [-do not recognize this issue; they are
# | concerned solely with-] {+code, and nominally carries a free license,+}
-# | the [-licensing-] {+users cannot run modified versions+} of {+it, so+} the
-# | [-source code.-] {+executable is de-facto nonfree.+}
+# | the [-licensing-] {+users cannot usefully run modified versions+} of {+it,
+# | so+} the [-source code.-] {+executable is de-facto nonfree.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Second, and more important, many products containing computers (including "
@@ -377,15 +411,15 @@
#| "for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned solely "
#| "with the licensing of the source code."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"ثاÙÙاÙØ ÙاÙØ£ÙÙ
Ø Ø§ÙعدÙد Ù
٠اÙÙ
Ùتجات اÙتÙ
تØÙÙ Øاسبات (بÙ
ا ÙÙ Ø°Ù٠اÙعدÙد Ù
Ù "
"أجÙزة اÙØ£ÙدرÙÙد) تأت٠Ù
ØÙ
ÙØ© ببرÙ
جÙات
تÙÙÙØ°ÙØ© ÙبرÙ
جÙات Øرة اÙÙ
ØµØ¯Ø±Ø ÙÙÙ "
@@ -399,15 +433,11 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po,v
retrieving revision 1.65
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -b -r1.65 -r1.66
--- open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:06 -0000 1.65
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.66
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-28 14:55+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Bulgarian <dict@fsa-bg.org>\n"
@@ -335,47 +335,57 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000
1.19
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.de-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000
1.20
@@ -136,40 +136,57 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. For example, <span class="removed"><del><strong>“Open
Watcom”</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open
Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. For example, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“Open Watcom”</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, when a <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free</em></ins></span>
program's source code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria for open source
are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe an
+executable as “open source,” because its source code is
+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical situations
+where the source code is open source (and free) but the executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is</em></ins></span> when a
program's source code
+carries a weak <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free</em></ins></span> license,
one without copyleft, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>but</em></ins></span> its
executables <span class="removed"><del><strong>can</strong></del></span>
+carry additional nonfree conditions. <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
-<p>If</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>If</em></ins></span> these executables <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fully</strong></del></span> correspond <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exactly</em></ins></span> to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to make and
-distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
-computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
-where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+<p>If these</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Supposing the</em></ins></span> executables <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fully</strong></del></span>
+correspond <span class="inserted"><ins><em>exactly</em></ins></span> to the
released <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources, they
+qualify as open source but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>sources—which may or may</em></ins></span> not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>as free software. However, in that
+case users</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>be so—users</em></ins></span> can
compile the source code to make and distribute
+free
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is
no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>most important in practice,
many</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>important.
Many</em></ins></span> products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>effectively using</em></ins></span> different
executables; only one
+privileged company can make executables that can run in the device <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or can access</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+use</em></ins></span> its full capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw
+it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, and
+nominally carries a free license, the users cannot <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usefully</em></ins></span> run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
-Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>We</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(We</em></ins></span>
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>practice.</p>
<p>The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the
-licensing of the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not free.</p>
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these nonfree</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These</em></ins></span> executables, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>when</strong></del></span> made from source code
<span class="removed"><del><strong>such as Linux</strong></del></span> that is
+open source and free, are
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>open source</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken of as “open
+source,”</em></ins></span> but <span class="removed"><del><strong>not
free.</p></strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>they are
<em>not</em> free software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -547,7 +564,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:07 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.120
retrieving revision 1.121
diff -u -b -r1.120 -r1.121
--- open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.120
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.121
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: webmasters@gnu.org\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-11-20 22:00+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <www-de-translators@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -274,64 +274,119 @@
"Praktische Unterschiede zwischen <em>Freie Software</em> und <em>Open-Source-"
"Software</em>"
+# # Add new paragraph.
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
-# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
-# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
-# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. [-First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so
+# | they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, few programs use those
+# | licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
-#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
-#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
-#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
-#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
-#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
-#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
-#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
-#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use those licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
-msgstr ""
-"In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig lockerer als "
-"Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtlicher freigegebene
Freie-"
-"Software-Quellcode die Voraussetzungen von Open Source erfüllen. Beinahe "
-"sämtliche Open-Source-Software ist Freie Software, aber es gibt Ausnahmen:</"
-"p>\n"
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
+msgstr ""
+"In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig schwächer als "
+"Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtliche Freie Software die "
+"Voraussetzungen von Open Source erfüllen. Beinahe sämtliche Open-Source-"
+"Software ist Freie Software, aber es gibt Ausnahmen:</p>\n"
+"<p>Erstens sind einige Open-Source-Lizenzen zu restriktiv, sie erfüllen also
"
+"nicht die Voraussetzungen für freie Lizenzen. Glücklicherweise verwenden
nur "
+"wenige Programme diese Lizenzen."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would
+# | qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software,
+# | but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source licenses are too
+# | restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example,
+# | [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree because its
+# | license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately.
+# | Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig schwächer als "
+"Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtliche Freie Software die "
+"Voraussetzungen von Open Source erfüllen. Beinahe sämtliche Open-Source-"
+"Software ist Freie Software, aber es gibt Ausnahmen:</p>\n"
"<p>Erstens sind einige Open-Source-Lizenzen zu restriktiv, sie erfüllen also
"
"nicht die Voraussetzungen für freie Lizenzen. <em>Open Watcom</em> ist "
"beispielsweise unfrei, weil dessen Lizenz nicht erlaubt eine modifizierte "
-"Version zu erstellen und es privat zu benutzen. Glücklicherweise verwenden "
+"Version zu erstellen und sie privat zu benutzen. Glücklicherweise verwenden "
"nur wenige Programme diese Lizenzen."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Die Open-Source-Kriterien beziehen sich einzig auf die Lizenzierung des "
+"Quellcodes. Somit sind diese unfreien ausführbaren Dateien, wenn sie aus "
+"Quellcode wie beispielsweise Linux, der Open Source und frei ist, erstellt "
+"werden, quelloffen, aber nicht frei."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Wenn diese ausführbaren Dateien den freigegebenen Quellcode vollständig "
"entsprechen, gelten sie als Open Source, nicht aber als Freie Software. In "
@@ -339,7 +394,17 @@
"ausführbare Dateien zu erstellen und zu verteilen."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto
+# | nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -352,15 +417,15 @@
#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Letztendlich, und in der Praxis am wichtigsten, enthalten viele Produkte "
"Prüfsignaturen von Rechnern in ihren ausführbaren Programmen, um Benutzer "
@@ -375,26 +440,29 @@
" die ausführbare Datei ist de facto unfrei."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Viele Android-Produkte enthalten unfreie tivoisierte ausführbare Dateien von
"
"Linux, obwohl ihr Quellcode unter der GNU GPL, Version 2, steht. Wir haben "
"die GNU GPL, Version 3, konzipiert, um diese Praxis zu verbieten."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Die Open-Source-Kriterien beziehen sich einzig auf die Lizenzierung des "
-"Quellcodes. Somit sind diese unfreien ausführbaren Dateien, wenn sie aus "
-"Quellcode wie beispielsweise Linux, der Open Source und frei ist, erstellt "
-"werden, quelloffen, aber nicht frei."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
@@ -1224,6 +1292,37 @@
#, fuzzy
#~| msgid ""
+#~| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#~| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free "
+#~| "software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open "
+#~| "source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some "
+#~| "open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#~| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#~| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it "
+#~| "privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#~ "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#~ "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#~ "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#~ "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#~ "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#~ "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#~ "few programs use such licenses."
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig lockerer als
"
+#~ "Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtlicher freigegebene "
+#~ "Freie-Software-Quellcode die Voraussetzungen von Open Source erfüllen. "
+#~ "Beinahe sämtliche Open-Source-Software ist Freie Software, aber es gibt "
+#~ "Ausnahmen:</p>\n"
+#~ "<p>Erstens sind einige Open-Source-Lizenzen zu restriktiv, sie erfüllen "
+#~ "also nicht die Voraussetzungen für freie Lizenzen. <em>Open Watcom</em> "
+#~ "ist beispielsweise unfrei, weil dessen Lizenz nicht erlaubt eine "
+#~ "modifizierte Version zu erstellen und es privat zu benutzen. "
+#~ "Glücklicherweise verwenden nur wenige Programme diese Lizenzen."
+
+#, fuzzy
+#~| msgid ""
#~| "Second, when a program's source code carries a weak license, one without "
#~| "copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. <a "
#~| "href=\"https://code.visualstudio.com/License/\";>Microsoft does this with "
@@ -1394,26 +1493,6 @@
#~ "Quellcode nutzen darf.</q>"
#~ msgid ""
-#~ "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
-#~ "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
-#~ "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
-#~ "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
-#~ "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
-#~ "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
-#~ "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
-#~ "programs use such licenses."
-#~ msgstr ""
-#~ "In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig schwächer "
-#~ "als Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtliche Freie "
-#~ "Software die Voraussetzungen von Open Source erfüllen. Beinahe sämtliche
"
-#~ "Open-Source-Software ist Freie Software, aber es gibt Ausnahmen:</p>\n"
-#~ "<p>Erstens sind einige Open-Source-Lizenzen zu restriktiv, sie erfüllen "
-#~ "also nicht die Voraussetzungen für freie Lizenzen. <em>Open Watcom</em> "
-#~ "ist beispielsweise unfrei, weil dessen Lizenz nicht erlaubt eine "
-#~ "modifizierte Version zu erstellen und sie privat zu benutzen. "
-#~ "Glücklicherweise verwenden nur wenige Programme diese Lizenzen."
-
-#~ msgid ""
#~ "Since the obvious meaning for “open source” is not the "
#~ "meaning that its advocates intend, the result is that most people "
#~ "misunderstand the term. According to writer Neal Stephenson, “"
@@ -1483,23 +1562,6 @@
#~ msgstr ""
#~ "Copyright © 2007, 2010, 2012<ins>, 2014</ins>, 2015 Richard Stallman."
-# # Add new paragraph.
-#~ msgid ""
-#~ "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
-#~ "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
-#~ "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
-#~ "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
-#~ "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
-#~ "few programs use those licenses."
-#~ msgstr ""
-#~ "In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig schwächer "
-#~ "als Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtliche Freie "
-#~ "Software die Voraussetzungen von Open Source erfüllen. Beinahe sämtliche
"
-#~ "Open-Source-Software ist Freie Software, aber es gibt Ausnahmen:</p>\n"
-#~ "<p>Erstens sind einige Open-Source-Lizenzen zu restriktiv, sie erfüllen "
-#~ "also nicht die Voraussetzungen für freie Lizenzen. Glücklicherweise "
-#~ "verwenden nur wenige Programme diese Lizenzen."
-
#~ msgid ""
#~ "Second, and more important, many products containing computers (including "
#~ "many Android devices) come with executable programs that correspond to "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -b -r1.32 -r1.33
--- open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.32
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.33
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <web-translators@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -401,47 +401,57 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.144
retrieving revision 1.145
diff -u -b -r1.144 -r1.145
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.144
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.145
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <jfrtnaga@gnu.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <www-es-general@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -268,15 +268,29 @@
msgstr "Diferencias prácticas entre software libre y código abierto"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
+# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow
+# | making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few
+# | programs use such licenses.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"En la práctica, el código abierto tiene criterios menos estrictos que los "
"del software libre. Que sepamos, todo el código fuente existente del "
@@ -289,23 +303,87 @@
"son muy pocos los programas que llevan tales licencias."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow
+# | making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few
+# | programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"En la práctica, el código abierto tiene criterios menos estrictos que los "
+"del software libre. Que sepamos, todo el código fuente existente del "
+"software libre publicado se podrÃa considerar de código abierto. Y casi
todo "
+"el software de código abierto es software libre, pero hay algunas "
+"excepciones. En primer lugar, algunas licencias de código abierto son "
+"demasiado restrictivas, por lo que no se las puede considerar licencias "
+"libres. Por ejemplo, Open Watcom no es libre porque su licencia no permite "
+"hacer versiones modificadas y utilizarlas de forma privada. Afortunadamente, "
+"son muy pocos los programas que llevan tales licencias."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Los criterios del código abierto solo atienden a la licencia del código "
+"fuente. De modo que esos ejecutables privativos, cuando están hechos a "
+"partir de un código fuente como Linux, que es de código abierto y libre,
son "
+"de código abierto pero no son libres."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Si estos ejecutables se corresponden totalmente con los archivos fuente "
"publicados, serán de código abierto, pero no software libre. No obstante,
en "
@@ -313,16 +391,38 @@
"distribuir ejecutables libres."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto
+# | nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Por último, y lo que es más importante en la práctica, muchos productos
que "
"contienen ordenadores verifican las firmas de sus programas ejecutables para "
@@ -336,27 +436,30 @@
"de modo que el ejecutable no es de hecho libre."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Muchos productos de Android contienen ejecutables de Linux <em>tivoizados</"
"em> que no son libres, aun cuando su código fuente está bajo la GPL de GNU,
"
"versión 2. Concebimos la versión 3 de la GPL de GNU para prohibir esta "
"práctica."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Los criterios del código abierto solo atienden a la licencia del código "
-"fuente. De modo que esos ejecutables privativos, cuando están hechos a "
-"partir de un código fuente como Linux, que es de código abierto y libre,
son "
-"de código abierto pero no son libres."
-
# type: Content of: <h3>
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po,v
retrieving revision 1.72
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -u -b -r1.72 -r1.73
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.72
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.73
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-01-16 23:22+0330\n"
"Last-Translator: Mahyar Moghimi <mahyar.moqimi@gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Persian <www-fa-general@list.gnu.org>\n"
@@ -288,47 +288,57 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.129
retrieving revision 1.130
diff -u -b -r1.129 -r1.130
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.129
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.130
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-12-30 17:31+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <trad-gnu@april.org>\n"
@@ -258,15 +258,29 @@
msgstr "Différences pratiques entre logiciel libre et open source"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
+# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow
+# | making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few
+# | programs use such licenses.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"En pratique, l'open source défend des critères un peu moins stricts que
ceux "
"du logiciel libre. Ã notre connaissance, le code source de tous les "
@@ -279,23 +293,87 @@
"programmes utilisant ces licences sont rares."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow
+# | making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few
+# | programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"En pratique, l'open source défend des critères un peu moins stricts que
ceux "
+"du logiciel libre. Ã notre connaissance, le code source de tous les "
+"logiciels libres publiés existants répond aux critères de l'open source. "
+"Presque tous les logiciels open source sont des logiciels libres, mais il y "
+"a des exceptions. D'abord, certaines licences open source sont trop "
+"restrictives, donc se disqualifient en tant que licences libres. Par "
+"exemple, Open Watcom est non libre parce que sa licence ne permet pas d'en "
+"faire une version modifiée et de l'utiliser en privé. Heureusement, les "
+"programmes utilisant ces licences sont rares."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Les critères de l'open source s'intéressent uniquement à la licence du
code "
+"source. Par conséquent ces exécutables non libres, quand ils sont obtenus Ã
"
+"partir d'un code source comme Linux, qui est open source et libre, sont open "
+"source mais non libres."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Si ces exécutables correspondent exactement aux sources publiées, ils "
"répondent aux critères de l'open source, mais pas à ceux du logiciel
libre. "
@@ -303,16 +381,38 @@
"exécutables libres et distribuer ces derniers."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto
+# | nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Enfin, le plus important en pratique est que beaucoup de produits "
"manufacturés embarquant des ordinateurs vérifient les signatures de leurs "
@@ -327,27 +427,30 @@
"libre, de fait."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"De nombreux produits sous Android contiennent des exécutables de Linux "
"tivoïsés, bien que la licence de leur code source soit la GNU GPL "
"(version 2). Nous avons fait en sorte d'interdire cette pratique dans la "
"version 3."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Les critères de l'open source s'intéressent uniquement à la licence du
code "
-"source. Par conséquent ces exécutables non libres, quand ils sont obtenus Ã
"
-"partir d'un code source comme Linux, qui est open source et libre, sont open "
-"source mais non libres."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000
1.33
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000
1.34
@@ -138,44 +138,51 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little <span
class="removed"><del><strong>weaker</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>looser</em></ins></span> than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>released</em></ins></span> free
software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> would
qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example, Open Watcom is
nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example,
Open Watcom is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a free program's source
code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. If these executables correspond exactly to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to
make</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>more
important,</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
-computers
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>(including many Android devices) come
with</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>check signatures on
their</em></ins></span> executable programs <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that
-correspond</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software source code, but the devices do not allow
-the user to install modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
-from installing different</em></ins></span> executables; only one
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can
-make executables that can run in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>device or can access its full
-capabilities.</em></ins></span> We call these devices
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Tivo)</em></ins></span>
-where we first saw it.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code, and nominally carries a free
license, the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more important, many
products containing computers
+(including many Android devices) come</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria for open source are concerned
solely</em></ins></span> with <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe
an</em></ins></span>
+executable <span class="removed"><del><strong>programs</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open source,” because its
source code is
+available</em></ins></span> that
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>correspond to free
software</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>way. That
causes confusion in paradoxical situations
+where the</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code is open source (and free)</em></ins></span> but
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>devices do</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code
+carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables
+carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables
+correspond exactly to the released sources—which may or
may</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>allow</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>be so—users can
compile</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>user</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>install modified versions of
those</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>make and distribute
+free executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from effectively using different</em></ins></span> executables;
only one
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can make executables that can run
in</em></ins></span> the <span class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify
them.</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>device and
+use its full capabilities.</em></ins></span> We call these devices
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(Tivo)</em></ins></span> where we first saw
+it.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>These executables are
not</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Even if the
executable is made from</em></ins></span> free <span
class="removed"><del><strong>software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>source code, and
+nominally carries a free license, the users cannot usefully run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
-Linux,</em></ins></span> even though <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> source code is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software. The</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
-
-<p>The</em></ins></span> criteria for open source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do not recognize this
-issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with the
-licensing of the source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not free.</p></em></ins></span>
+Linux,</em></ins></span> even though <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> source code is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>free software. The criteria
for</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>under GNU GPL version
2. (We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that
is</em></ins></span>
+open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do not recognize this
+issue; they</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and
free,</em></ins></span> are <span class="removed"><del><strong>concerned solely
with the licensing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the source code.</p></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open
+source,” but they are <em>not</em> free
software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -556,7 +563,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:07 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.51
retrieving revision 1.52
diff -u -b -r1.51 -r1.52
--- open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.51
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000 1.52
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-06 22:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Martina Bebek <martinaporec@gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: GNU Croatian Translation Team <www-hr-lista@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -309,10 +309,9 @@
# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
-# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
-# | do not qualify as free licenses. {+For example, Open Watcom is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately.+} Fortunately, few programs use [-those-] {+such+} licenses.
+# | exceptions. [-First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so
+# | they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, few programs use those
+# | licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
@@ -325,11 +324,37 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
+msgstr ""
+"U praksi, otvoreni izvorni kod se zalaže za malo slabije kriterije od onih "
+"slobodnog softvera. Koliko znamo, sav postojeÄi slobodan softver bi se "
+"kvalificirao kao otvoreni izvorni kod. Gotovo sav softver otvorenog izvornog "
+"koda je slobodan softver, ali postoje iznimke. Prvo, neke licence otvorenog "
+"izvornog koda su previše restriktivne, prema tome se ne kvalificiraju kao "
+"slobodne licence. SreÄom, samo nekoliko programa koristi te licence."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would
+# | qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software,
+# | but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source licenses are too
+# | restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. {+For example, Open
+# | Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified
+# | version and using it privately.+} Fortunately, few programs use [-those-]
+# | {+such+} licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use those licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"U praksi, otvoreni izvorni kod se zalaže za malo slabije kriterije od onih "
"slobodnog softvera. Koliko znamo, sav postojeÄi slobodan softver bi se "
@@ -340,22 +365,32 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more important,-] {+most important in
-# | practice,+} many products containing computers [-(including many Android
-# | devices) come with-] {+check signatures on their+} executable programs
-# | [-that correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not
-# | allow the user-] to [-install modified versions of those-] {+block users
-# | from installing different+} executables; only one [-special-]
-# | {+privileged+} company [-has the power to modify them.-] {+can make
-# | executables that can run in the device or can access its full
+msgid ""
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-more important, many-]
+# | {+important. Many+} products containing computers [-(including many
+# | Android devices) come with-] {+check signatures on their+} executable
+# | programs [-that correspond-] to [-free software source code, but the
+# | devices do not allow the user to install modified versions of those-]
+# | {+block users from effectively using different+} executables; only one
+# | [-special-] {+privileged+} company [-has-] {+can make executables that can
+# | run in+} the [-power to modify them.-] {+device and use its full
# | capabilities.+} We call these devices [-“tyrants”,-]
# | {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is called
# | “tivoization” after the product {+(Tivo)+} where we first saw
@@ -363,8 +398,8 @@
# | code-] {+Even if the executable+} is {+made from+} free [-software. The
# | criteria for open-] source [-do not recognize this issue; they are
# | concerned solely with-] {+code, and nominally carries a free license,+}
-# | the [-licensing-] {+users cannot run modified versions+} of {+it, so+} the
-# | [-source code.-] {+executable is de-facto nonfree.+}
+# | the [-licensing-] {+users cannot usefully run modified versions+} of {+it,
+# | so+} the [-source code.-] {+executable is de-facto nonfree.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Second, and more important, many products containing computers (including "
@@ -378,15 +413,15 @@
#| "for open source do not recognize this issue; they are concerned solely "
#| "with the licensing of the source code."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Drugo, važnije, mnogi proizvodi koji sadrže raÄunala (ukljuÄujuÄi mnoge "
"Android ureÄaje) dolaze sa izvrÅ¡nim programima koji odgovaraju izvornom
kodu "
@@ -401,15 +436,11 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
-msgstr ""
-
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000
1.17
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.it-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:11 -0000
1.18
@@ -138,39 +138,50 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. For example, <span class="removed"><del><strong>“Open
Watcom”</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open
Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. For example, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“Open Watcom”</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a free program's source
code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. If these executables correspond exactly to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to
make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
-computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
-where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
-Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
-
-<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
-licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more
important</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria
for open source are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe an
+executable as “open source,” because its source code is
+available that way. That causes confusion</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>practice, many</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>paradoxical situations
+where the source code is open source (and free) but the executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code
+carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables
+carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables
+correspond exactly to the released sources—which may or may not
+be so—users can compile the source code to make and distribute
+free executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many</em></ins></span>
products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>effectively using</em></ins></span> different
executables; only one
+privileged company can make executables that can run in the device <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or can access</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+use</em></ins></span> its full capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw
+it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+nominally carries a free license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usefully</em></ins></span> run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>The criteria for open source do
not recognize this issue; they are
+concerned solely with the licensing</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Linux, even though its</em></ins></span>
source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code. Thus, these
+unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>code is
under GNU GPL version 2. (We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These</em></ins></span> executables, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>when</strong></del></span> made from source code
<span class="removed"><del><strong>such as Linux</strong></del></span> that is
+open source and free, are <span class="removed"><del><strong>open source but
not free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open
+source,” but they are <em>not</em> free
software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -546,7 +557,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:07 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:11 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.94
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -b -r1.94 -r1.95
--- open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:07 -0000 1.94
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:12 -0000 1.95
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-07-30 17:23+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <pescetti@gnu.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -319,11 +319,11 @@
# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
+# | not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately,
+# | few programs use such licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
@@ -338,11 +338,7 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"In pratica, open source indica criteri leggermente più deboli di quelli "
"previsti per il software libero. Per quanto ne sappiamo, tutto il software "
@@ -355,25 +351,92 @@
"tali licenze sono poco usate."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
+# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
+# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
+"In pratica, open source indica criteri leggermente più deboli di quelli "
+"previsti per il software libero. Per quanto ne sappiamo, tutto il software "
+"libero esistente è anche open source. E anche quasi tutto il software open "
+"source che è stato rilasciato sotto forma di codice sorgente è anche "
+"software libero, ma ci sono eccezioni. Innanzitutto, alcune licenze open "
+"source sono troppo restrittive (ad esempio: âOpen Watcomâ non è libero "
+"perché la sua licenza non permette di realizzare una versione modificata e "
+"usarla in privato) e non si possono considerare libere, ma fortunatamente "
+"tali licenze sono poco usate."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
-# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
-# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
-# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
-# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
-# | “tyrants,” and the practice is called
-# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
-# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and nominally
-# | carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
-# | the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source [-do not recognize this
+# | issue; they-] are concerned solely with the licensing of the source code.
+# | [-Thus, these unmodifiable executables, when made from-] {+However,
+# | people often describe an executable as “open source,” because
+# | its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is [-open-] {+available that way.
+# | That causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the+} source [-and
+# | free, are-] {+code is+} open source {+(and free)+} but [-not free. Many
+# | Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-] {+the
+# | executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"I criteri per l'open source non riconoscono questo problema; guardano "
+"solamente la licenza del codice sorgente. Quindi questi eseguibili non "
+"modificati, quando prodotti a partire da codice sorgente come Linux che è "
+"open source e libero, sono open source ma non liberi. Molti prodotti basati "
+"su Android contengono eseguibili Linux non liberi e âtivoizzatiâ."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-more important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, {+and nominally carries a free license,+} the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is
+# | {+de-facto+} nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -386,15 +449,15 @@
#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
#| "nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"E poi, e questo è più importante in pratica, molti prodotti che contengono "
"computer controllano l'integrità dei loro programmi eseguibili per impedire "
@@ -409,34 +472,13 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
-# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
-# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
-# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
-#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
-#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
-#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
-#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"I criteri per l'open source non riconoscono questo problema; guardano "
-"solamente la licenza del codice sorgente. Quindi questi eseguibili non "
-"modificati, quando prodotti a partire da codice sorgente come Linux che è "
-"open source e libero, sono open source ma non liberi. Molti prodotti basati "
-"su Android contengono eseguibili Linux non liberi e âtivoizzatiâ."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.96
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -b -r1.96 -r1.97
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.96
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:12 -0000 1.97
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-11-01 12:00+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@fsij.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <web-translators-ja@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -270,11 +270,7 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"å®éããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã¯èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®ãã®ããããããåºæºã«ç«èãã¾ããã"
"ãããã¡ã®ç¥ãéããæ¢åã®ãã¹ã¦ã®ãªãªã¼ã¹ãããèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®ã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼"
@@ -288,15 +284,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"å®éããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã¯èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®ãã®ããããããåºæºã«ç«èãã¾ããã"
+"ãããã¡ã®ç¥ãéããæ¢åã®ãã¹ã¦ã®ãªãªã¼ã¹ãããèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®ã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼"
+"ãã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã¨ãã¦é©æ
¼ã§ããããã»ã¨ãã©ãã¹ã¦ã®ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã»ã½ãã"
+"ã¦ã§ã¢ãèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã§ãããä¾å¤ãããã¾ãã第ä¸ã«ãä¸é¨ã®ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹"
+"ã®ã©ã¤ã»ã³ã¹ã¯ã¨ã¦ãå¶éãå¼·ããèªç±ãªã©ã¤ã»ã³ã¹ã¨ãã¦ã¯é©æ
¼ã§ã¯ããã¾ããã"
+"ãã¨ãã°ã“Open
Watcom”ã§ã¯ããã®ã©ã¤ã»ã³ã¹ãå¤æ´ãããã¼ã¸ã§ã³ã"
+"ä½æãã¦ãã©ã¤ãã¼ãã«ä½¿ãã®ãèªããªãã®ã§ãä¸èªç±ã§ãã幸ãã«ãã¦ããã®ãã"
+"ãªã©ã¤ã»ã³ã¹ã¯ãã»ãã®å°æ°ã®ããã°ã©ã
ã«ãã使ããã¦ãã¾ããã"
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã®åºæºã¯ãã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼ãã®ã©ã¤ã»ã³ã·ã³ã°ã«ã¤ãã¦ã
ããé¢ä¸ãã¾"
+"ããã§ãããããããã£ãä¸èªç±ãªå®è¡å½¢å¼ã¯ãLinuxã®ãããªãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã§èªç±"
+"ãªã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼ãããä½ãããå
´åããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã§ããèªç±ã§ã¯ããã¾ããã"
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"ãããã£ãå®è¡å½¢å¼ãé¢é£ã®ã½ã¼ã¹ã«å®å
¨ã«å¯¾å¿ãã¦ããã°ãããã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹"
"ã¨ãã¦é©æ ¼ã§ãããèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã¨ãã¦ã¯ä¸é©æ
¼ã§ãããããããã®å ´åãã¦ã¼"
@@ -316,15 +357,15 @@
#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"æå¾ã«ãå®éã«ã¯ããã£ã¨ãéè¦ãªã®ã§ãããå¤ãã®ã³ã³ãã¥ã¼ã¿ãå
èµãã製å"
"ã¯ãå®è¡ããã°ã©ã
ã®é»åç½²åããã§ãã¯ãã¦ãã¦ã¼ã¶ãç°ãªãå®è¡å½¢å¼ãã¤ã³ã¹"
@@ -337,25 +378,23 @@
"ãããã®å®è¡å½¢å¼ã¯äºå®ä¸ä¸èªç±ãªã®ã§ãã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"å¤ãã®ã¢ã³ããã¤ãã®è£½åã«ã¯ãLinuxã®tivoizationãããä¸èªç±ãªå®è¡å½¢å¼ãå
¥ã£"
"ã¦ãã¾ãããã®ã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼ãã¯GNU GPLãã¼ã¸ã§ã³2ã®å
ãªã®ã§ãããããããã¡ã¯"
"GNU GPLãã¼ã¸ã§ã³3ããã®æ
£ç¿ãç¦æ¢ããããã«è¨è¨ãã¾ããã"
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã®åºæºã¯ãã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼ãã®ã©ã¤ã»ã³ã·ã³ã°ã«ã¤ãã¦ã
ããé¢ä¸ãã¾"
-"ããã§ãããããããã£ãä¸èªç±ãªå®è¡å½¢å¼ã¯ãLinuxã®ãããªãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã§èªç±"
-"ãªã½ã¼ã¹ã³ã¼ãããä½ãããå
´åããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã§ããèªç±ã§ã¯ããã¾ããã"
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000
1.22
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:12 -0000
1.23
@@ -138,39 +138,50 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. For example, <span class="removed"><del><strong>“Open
Watcom”</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open
Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. For example, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“Open Watcom”</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a free program's source
code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. If these executables correspond exactly to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to
make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
-computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
-where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
-Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
-
-<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
-licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more
important</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria
for open source are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe an
+executable as “open source,” because its source code is
+available that way. That causes confusion</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>practice, many</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>paradoxical situations
+where the source code is open source (and free) but the executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code
+carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables
+carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables
+correspond exactly to the released sources—which may or may not
+be so—users can compile the source code to make and distribute
+free executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many</em></ins></span>
products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>effectively using</em></ins></span> different
executables; only one
+privileged company can make executables that can run in the device <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or can access</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+use</em></ins></span> its full capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw
+it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+nominally carries a free license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usefully</em></ins></span> run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>The criteria for open source do
not recognize this issue; they are
+concerned solely with the licensing</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Linux, even though its</em></ins></span>
source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code. Thus, these
+unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>code is
under GNU GPL version 2. (We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These</em></ins></span> executables, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>when</strong></del></span> made from source code
<span class="removed"><del><strong>such as Linux</strong></del></span> that is
+open source and free, are <span class="removed"><del><strong>open source but
not free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open
+source,” but they are <em>not</em> free
software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -546,7 +557,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:09 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:12 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.31
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:12 -0000 1.32
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-01-15 02:06+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Donatas Klimašauskas <klimasauskas.d@gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Lithuanian <web-translators@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -340,11 +340,11 @@
# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
+# | not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately,
+# | few programs use such licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
@@ -359,11 +359,43 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
+msgstr ""
+"Praktikoje, atviras Å¡altinis atstovauja Å¡iek tiek palaidesnius kriterijus, "
+"nei tie laisvos programinÄs įrangos. Kiek mes žinome, visos "
+"egzistuojanÄios, iÅ¡leistos laisvos programinÄs įrangos Å¡altinio kodas
būtų "
+"kvalifikuojamas kaip atviras Å¡altinis. Beveik visa atviro Å¡altinio "
+"programinÄ Ä¯ranga yra laisva programinÄ Ä¯ranga, bet yra iÅ¡imÄių.
Pirma, kai "
+"kurios atviro Å¡altinio licencijos yra per daug apribojanÄios tiek, kad jos "
+"nÄra kvalifikuojamos kaip laisvos licencijos. Pavyzdžiui, „Open "
+"Watcom“ yra nelaisva, nes jos licencija neleidžiama padaryti "
+"modifikuotÄ
versijÄ
ir jÄ
naudoti privaÄiai. Laimei, kelios programos "
+"naudoja tokias licencijas."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
+# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
+# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Praktikoje, atviras Å¡altinis atstovauja Å¡iek tiek palaidesnius kriterijus, "
"nei tie laisvos programinÄs įrangos. Kiek mes žinome, visos "
@@ -377,25 +409,57 @@
"naudoja tokias licencijas."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source [-do not recognize this
+# | issue; they-] are concerned solely with the licensing of the source code.
+# | [-Thus, these unmodifiable executables, when made from-] {+However,
+# | people often describe an executable as “open source,” because
+# | its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is [-open-] {+available that way.
+# | That causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the+} source [-and
+# | free, are-] {+code is+} open source {+(and free)+} but [-not free. Many
+# | Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-] {+the
+# | executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Kriterijai atviram šaltiniui šitos problemos neatpažįsta; jais
rūpinamasi "
+"tik Å¡altinio kodo licencijavimu. TodÄl, Å¡ie nemodifikuojami vykdomieji "
+"failai, kai yra padaromi iš tokio šaltinio kodo, kaip Linux, kuris yra "
+"atviras Å¡altinis ir laisvas, yra atviro Å¡altinio, bet ne laisvi. Daug "
+"Android produktų turi nelaisvus tivonizuotus Linux vykdomuosius failus."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | [-Second,-]{+Finally,+} and [-more-] {+most+} important in practice, many
-# | products containing computers check signatures on their executable
-# | programs to block users from installing different executables; only one
-# | privileged company can make executables that can run in the device or can
-# | access its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | [-Second,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-more important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices
# | [-“tyrants”,-] {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is
# | called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first
# | saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, {+and
-# | nominally carries a free license,+} the users cannot run modified versions
-# | of it, so the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
+# | nominally carries a free license,+} the users cannot {+usefully+} run
+# | modified versions of it, so the executable is {+de-facto+} nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Second, and more important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -408,15 +472,15 @@
#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
#| "nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Antra, ir labiau svarbu praktikoje, daug produktų, turinÄių kompiuterius, "
"tikrina savo vykdomųjų programų parašus, kad naudotojus užblokuotų nuo
kitų "
@@ -431,34 +495,13 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The criteria for open source [-do not recognize this issue; they-] are
-# | concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-# | [-unmodifiable-] {+nonfree+} executables, when made from source code such
-# | as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free.
-# | [-Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux.-]
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
-#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
-#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
-#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
-#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Kriterijai atviram šaltiniui šitos problemos neatpažįsta; jais
rūpinamasi "
-"tik Å¡altinio kodo licencijavimu. TodÄl, Å¡ie nemodifikuojami vykdomieji "
-"failai, kai yra padaromi iš tokio šaltinio kodo, kaip Linux, kuris yra "
-"atviras Å¡altinis ir laisvas, yra atviro Å¡altinio, bet ne laisvi. Daug "
-"Android produktų turi nelaisvus tivonizuotus Linux vykdomuosius failus."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ml-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ml-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000
1.8
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ml-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:12 -0000
1.9
@@ -133,40 +133,57 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. For example, <span class="removed"><del><strong>“Open
Watcom”</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open
Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. For example, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“Open Watcom”</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, when a <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free</em></ins></span>
program's source code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria for open source
are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe an
+executable as “open source,” because its source code is
+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical situations
+where the source code is open source (and free) but the executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is</em></ins></span> when a
program's source code
+carries a weak <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free</em></ins></span> license,
one without copyleft, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>but</em></ins></span> its
executables <span class="removed"><del><strong>can</strong></del></span>
+carry additional nonfree conditions. <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
does this with Visual Studio Code,</a> for example.</p>
-<p>If</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>If</em></ins></span> these executables <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fully</strong></del></span> correspond <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exactly</em></ins></span> to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to make and
-distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
-computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
-where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+<p>If these</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Supposing the</em></ins></span> executables <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fully</strong></del></span>
+correspond <span class="inserted"><ins><em>exactly</em></ins></span> to the
released <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources, they
+qualify as open source but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>sources—which may or may</em></ins></span> not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>as free software. However, in that
+case users</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>be so—users</em></ins></span> can
compile the source code to make and distribute
+free
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is
no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>most important in practice,
many</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>important.
Many</em></ins></span> products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>effectively using</em></ins></span> different
executables; only one
+privileged company can make executables that can run in the device <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or can access</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+use</em></ins></span> its full capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw
+it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, and
+nominally carries a free license, the users cannot <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usefully</em></ins></span> run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
-Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>We</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(We</em></ins></span>
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>practice.</p>
<p>The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the
-licensing of the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not free.</p>
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these nonfree</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These</em></ins></span> executables, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>when</strong></del></span> made from source code
<span class="removed"><del><strong>such as Linux</strong></del></span> that is
+open source and free, are
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>open source</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken of as “open
+source,”</em></ins></span> but <span class="removed"><del><strong>not
free.</p></strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>they are
<em>not</em> free software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -538,7 +555,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:09 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:12 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po,v
retrieving revision 1.85
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -b -r1.85 -r1.86
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.85
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:12 -0000 1.86
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html 1\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-08-10 14:01+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Aiswarya Kaitheri Kandoth <aiswaryakk29@gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Malayalam <www-ml-gnu-malayalam-project-public@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -279,11 +279,11 @@
# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
+# | not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately,
+# | few programs use such licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
@@ -298,11 +298,42 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
+msgstr ""
+"ഫലതàµà´¤à´¿àµ½, à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿àµ»àµà´±àµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµà´àµà´à´¾àµ¾
à´à´°à´²àµà´ªà´ à´
à´¯à´àµà´
മാനദണàµà´¡à´àµà´àµ¾à´àµà´àµ à´µàµà´£àµà´à´¿ "
+"നിലà´àµà´³àµà´³àµà´¨àµà´¨àµ. à´à´àµà´àµ¾à´àµà´àµàµ à´
റിയാവàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¿à´à´¤àµà´¤àµà´³à´, നിലവിൽ
à´ªàµà´°à´à´¾à´¶à´¨à´ à´àµà´¯àµà´¤à´¿à´àµà´àµà´³àµà´³
à´à´²àµà´²à´¾ à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´° "
+"à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯àµ¼ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡àµà´
à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´à´¯à´¿ à´
à´à´àµà´à´°à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´à´¾à´µàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ.
à´à´à´¦àµà´¶à´ à´à´²àµà´²à´¾ à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ "
+"à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±àµà´ à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¾à´£àµàµ, à´ªà´àµà´·àµ
à´à´¤à´¿à´¨àµ à´à´¿à´² à´
പവാദà´àµà´à´³àµà´£àµà´àµ.
à´à´¦àµà´¯à´¤àµà´¤àµà´¤àµàµ, à´à´¿à´² à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº "
+"à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´àµà´àµ¾
വലàµà´²à´¾à´¤àµ
പരിമിതപàµà´ªàµà´àµà´¤àµà´¤àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ, à´
à´¤àµà´àµà´¾à´£àµà´àµ à´
വയൠസàµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´àµà´à´³à´¾à´¯à´¿ "
+"à´
à´à´àµà´à´°à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´µàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´²àµà´².
à´à´¦à´¾à´¹à´°à´£à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµàµ, “à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº
വാറàµà´±àµà´àµà´ (Open Watcom)” "
+"à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´®à´²àµà´²à´¾à´¤àµà´¤à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ
à´à´¾à´°à´£à´ à´à´¤à´¿àµ»àµà´±àµ സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´
à´®àµà´àµà´à´ªàµà´ªàµà´àµà´ à´à´°àµ പതിപàµà´ªàµ
à´à´£àµà´à´¾à´àµà´àµà´µà´¾à´¨àµ "
+"à´¸àµà´µà´à´¾à´°àµà´¯à´®à´¾à´¯à´¿ à´
à´¤àµàµ
à´à´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´àµà´µà´¾à´¨àµ à´
à´¨àµà´µà´¦à´¿à´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¿à´²àµà´².
à´à´¾à´àµà´¯à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµàµ, വളരൠà´àµà´±à´àµà´àµ
à´ªàµà´°àµà´àµà´°à´¾à´®àµà´àµ¾ "
+"മാതàµà´°à´®àµ à´
à´¤àµà´¤à´°à´
സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´àµà´àµ¾
à´à´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµà´³àµà´³àµ."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
+# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
+# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"ഫലതàµà´¤à´¿àµ½, à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿àµ»àµà´±àµà´¤à´¿à´¨àµà´àµà´à´¾àµ¾
à´à´°à´²àµà´ªà´ à´
à´¯à´àµà´
മാനദണàµà´¡à´àµà´àµ¾à´àµà´àµ à´µàµà´£àµà´à´¿ "
"നിലà´àµà´³àµà´³àµà´¨àµà´¨àµ. à´à´àµà´àµ¾à´àµà´àµàµ à´
റിയാവàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¿à´à´¤àµà´¤àµà´³à´, നിലവിൽ
à´ªàµà´°à´à´¾à´¶à´¨à´ à´àµà´¯àµà´¤à´¿à´àµà´àµà´³àµà´³
à´à´²àµà´²à´¾ à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´° "
@@ -315,23 +346,52 @@
"മാതàµà´°à´®àµ à´
à´¤àµà´¤à´°à´
സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´àµà´àµ¾
à´à´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµà´³àµà´³àµ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
മാനദണàµà´¡à´àµà´àµ¾ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´¤àµà´¤à´¿àµ½ മാതàµà´°à´®àµ
താതàµà´ªà´°àµà´¯à´ "
+"à´ªàµà´°à´à´à´¿à´ªàµà´ªà´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµà´³àµà´³àµ. à´
തായതàµàµ, à´à´¤àµà´¤à´°à´
à´®àµà´àµà´à´ªàµà´ªàµà´àµà´¤àµà´¤à´¾àµ» à´à´´à´¿à´¯à´¾à´¤àµà´¤
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿à´³àµà´àµ¾, ലിനà´àµà´¸àµ "
+"à´ªàµà´²àµà´³àµà´³ à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµà´
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´µàµà´®à´¾à´¯ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡à´¿àµ½
നിനàµà´¨àµà´ à´à´£àµà´à´¾à´àµà´àµà´®àµà´ªàµàµ¾, à´
വയàµà´²àµà´²à´¾à´ à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ "
+"à´à´£àµàµ à´ªà´àµà´·àµ à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´®à´²àµà´²."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"à´à´¤àµà´¤à´°à´ à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿à´³àµà´àµ¾
à´ªàµà´°à´à´¾à´¶à´¨à´ à´àµà´¯àµà´¤ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸à´¿à´¨àµ
à´ªàµàµ¼à´£à´®à´¾à´¯àµà´
à´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´£àµà´àµà´à´¿àµ½, à´
à´µ
à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº "
"à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´à´¯à´¿ à´à´£à´àµà´à´¾à´àµà´à´¾à´
à´ªà´àµà´·àµ à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯àµ¼ à´à´à´¿à´²àµà´².
à´à´¨àµà´¨à´¿à´°àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¾à´²àµà´, à´
സനàµà´¦àµ¼à´à´¤àµà´¤à´¿àµ½ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ "
@@ -339,16 +399,17 @@
"à´à´ªà´¯àµà´àµà´¤à´¾à´àµà´àµ¾à´àµà´àµàµ à´à´´à´¿à´¯àµà´."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
-# | computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-# | from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-# | make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-# | capabilities. We call these devices [-“tyrants”,-]
-# | {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is called
-# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
-# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally
-# | carries a free license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
-# | the executable is de-facto nonfree.
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | [-“tyrants”,-] {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is
+# | called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first
+# | saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, and
+# | nominally carries a free license, the users cannot {+usefully+} run
+# | modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -361,15 +422,15 @@
#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"à´
വസാനതàµà´¤àµà´¤àµà´, ഫലതàµà´¤à´¿àµ½
à´àµà´àµà´¤àµ½ à´ªàµà´°à´¾à´§à´¾à´¨àµà´¯à´®àµà´³àµà´³à´¤àµà´, പല
à´à´²àµà´ªà´¨àµà´¨à´àµà´à´³àµà´àµà´¯àµà´
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿àµ¾ "
"à´ªàµà´°àµà´àµà´°à´¾à´®àµà´à´³à´¿àµ½
à´µàµà´¯à´¤àµà´¯à´¸àµà´¤à´®à´¾à´¯ മറàµà´±àµà´¤àµà´àµà´à´¿à´²àµà´
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿àµ¾ à´àµ»à´¸àµà´±àµà´±à´¾àµ¾
à´àµà´¯àµà´¯àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¿àµ½ നിനàµà´¨àµà´ "
@@ -383,26 +444,29 @@
"à´®àµà´àµà´à´ªàµà´ªàµà´àµà´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´¯ പതിപàµà´ªàµàµ
à´à´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´àµà´µà´¾àµ» à´à´´à´¿à´¯à´¿à´²àµà´², à´
à´¤àµà´àµà´£àµà´àµàµ à´ à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿àµ¾
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´®à´²àµà´²à´¾à´¤àµà´¤à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡àµ à´àµà´¨àµ
à´ªàµà´¤àµà´¸à´®àµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´ 2-à´à´ പതിപàµà´ªà´¿à´¨àµ
à´àµà´´à´¿àµ½ à´à´£àµà´àµà´à´¿àµ½ à´ªàµà´²àµà´, പല
à´àµ»à´¡àµà´°àµà´¯àµà´¡àµ "
"à´à´²àµà´ªà´¨àµà´¨à´àµà´à´³àµà´ ലിനà´àµà´¸à´¿àµ»àµà´±àµ
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´®à´²àµà´²à´¾à´¤àµà´¤
à´à´¿à´µàµà´¯àµà´¸àµà´¡àµ
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿à´³àµà´àµ¾ à´
à´à´àµà´à´¿à´¯à´¤à´¾à´£àµàµ. à´ à´àµà´¯àµà´¤à´¿ "
"à´¤à´à´¯àµà´¨àµà´¨ തരതàµà´¤à´¿àµ½ à´àµà´¨àµ
à´ªàµà´¤àµà´¸à´®àµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´ 3-à´à´ പതിപàµà´ªàµàµ
à´à´àµà´àµ¾ à´°àµà´ªà´à´²àµà´ªà´¨
à´àµà´¯àµà´¤à´¿à´°à´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµ."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
മാനദണàµà´¡à´àµà´àµ¾ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
സമàµà´®à´¤à´ªà´¤àµà´°à´¤àµà´¤à´¿àµ½ മാതàµà´°à´®àµ
താതàµà´ªà´°àµà´¯à´ "
-"à´ªàµà´°à´à´à´¿à´ªàµà´ªà´¿à´¯àµà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨àµà´³àµà´³àµ. à´
തായതàµàµ, à´à´¤àµà´¤à´°à´
à´®àµà´àµà´à´ªàµà´ªàµà´àµà´¤àµà´¤à´¾àµ» à´à´´à´¿à´¯à´¾à´¤àµà´¤
à´à´àµà´¸à´¿à´àµà´¯àµà´àµà´à´¬à´¿à´³àµà´àµ¾, ലിനà´àµà´¸àµ "
-"à´ªàµà´²àµà´³àµà´³ à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµà´
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´µàµà´®à´¾à´¯ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´àµà´¡à´¿àµ½
നിനàµà´¨àµà´ à´à´£àµà´à´¾à´àµà´àµà´®àµà´ªàµàµ¾, à´
വയàµà´²àµà´²à´¾à´ à´à´ªàµà´ªàµº à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ "
-"à´à´£àµàµ à´ªà´àµà´·àµ à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°à´®à´²àµà´²."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.70
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -u -b -r1.70 -r1.71
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.70
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:13 -0000 1.71
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Justin van Steijn <justin50@live.nl>\n"
"Language-Team: Dutch\n"
@@ -265,11 +265,11 @@
# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
+# | not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately,
+# | few programs use such licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
@@ -284,11 +284,41 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
+msgstr ""
+"Praktisch gesproken hanteert open bron minder strikte vereisten dan vrije "
+"software. Voor zover wij weten voldoet alle uitgegeven broncode van vrije "
+"software ook aan die van open bron. Bijna alle open-bronsoftware is vrije "
+"software, maar er zijn uitzonderingen. Allereerst zijn er licenties die "
+"teveel beperkingen bevatten waardoor ze niet vrij zijn. Bijvoorbeeld “"
+"Open Watcom” is niet vrij, want de licentie staat het veranderen van "
+"de code voor eigen gebruik niet toe. Gelukkig zijn er slechts weinig "
+"programma's die een dergelijke licentie gebruiken."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
+# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
+# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Praktisch gesproken hanteert open bron minder strikte vereisten dan vrije "
"software. Voor zover wij weten voldoet alle uitgegeven broncode van vrije "
@@ -299,24 +329,54 @@
"de code voor eigen gebruik niet toe. Gelukkig zijn er slechts weinig "
"programma's die een dergelijke licentie gebruiken."
+# verduidelijkt
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Open bron erkent dit probleem niet; het gaat ze alleen om het uitgeven van "
+"de broncode. Deze programma's zijn gemaakt van broncode zoals Linux die "
+"zowel open bron als vrij is, maar het niet te wijzigen uitvoerbare programma "
+"is wel open bron maar niet vrij."
+
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Wanneer de executeerbare code volledig gemaakt is met de gedistribueerde "
"broncode is er sprake van open bron maar niet van vrije software. Gebruikers "
@@ -324,7 +384,17 @@
"als vrije code."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto
+# | nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -337,15 +407,15 @@
#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Als laatste, en belangrijker, bevatten veel apparaten met computers erin "
"uitvoerbare programma's afkomstig uit vrije-software-broncode waarbij deze "
@@ -358,27 +428,29 @@
"gebruiken, ook al is de broncode waar het van afstamt wel vrij."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Veel Android producten bevatten niet-vrije, tivo-achtige Linux programma's, "
"ook al valt de broncode onder GNU GPL verise 2. Om dit tegen te gaan is GNU "
"GPL versie 3 in het leven geroepen."
-# verduidelijkt
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Open bron erkent dit probleem niet; het gaat ze alleen om het uitgeven van "
-"de broncode. Deze programma's zijn gemaakt van broncode zoals Linux die "
-"zowel open bron als vrij is, maar het niet te wijzigen uitvoerbare programma "
-"is wel open bron maar niet vrij."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.96
retrieving revision 1.97
diff -u -b -r1.96 -r1.97
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.96
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:14 -0000 1.97
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-05-29 14:41-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail DOT com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <www-pl-trans@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -289,11 +289,11 @@
# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
+# | not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately,
+# | few programs use such licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
@@ -308,11 +308,7 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"W praktyce, oprogramowanie otwartego źródÅa opowiada siÄ za "
"kryteriami nieco luźniejszymi od wolnego oprogramowania. Z tego, "
@@ -327,23 +323,89 @@
"programów wykorzystuje takie licencje."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
+# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
+# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"W praktyce, oprogramowanie otwartego źródÅa opowiada siÄ za "
+"kryteriami nieco luźniejszymi od wolnego oprogramowania. Z tego, "
+"co wiemy, wszystkie programy udostÄpnione jako wolne oprogramowanie "
+"kwalifikowaÅyby siÄ także jako otwarte oprogramowanie. [Również] prawie "
+"wszystkie programy bÄdÄ
ce otwartym oprogramowaniem sÄ
wolnym "
+"oprogramowaniem, ale istnieje kilka wyjÄ
tków. Po pierwsze, "
+"niektóre licencje otwartego oprogramowania sÄ
zbyt restrykcyjne, by móc "
+"kwalifikowaÄ siÄ jako licencje wolnego oprogramowania. PrzykÅadowo „"
+"Open Watcom” jest niewolne, bo licencja nie pozwala na "
+"prywatne używanie zmodyfikowanej wersji. Na szczÄÅcie niewiele "
+"programów wykorzystuje takie licencje."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Kryteria otwartego oprogramowania zwracajÄ
uwagÄ tylko na licencjÄ
kodu "
+"źródÅowego. Te niewolne pliki wykonywalne, gdy sÄ
tworzone z kodu "
+"źródÅowego takiego jak Linux, który jest otwartym i wolnym "
+"oprogramowaniem, sÄ
wprawdzie otwarte ale nie sÄ
wolne."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"JeÅli te pliki wykonywalne w peÅni odpowiadajÄ
dostÄpnym źródÅom
to siÄ "
"kwalifikujÄ
jako otwarte oprogramowanie, ale nie jako wolne "
@@ -352,7 +414,17 @@
"wykonywalne."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto
+# | nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -365,15 +437,15 @@
#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Na koniec, i co najważniejsze w praktyce, wiele produktów "
"bÄdÄ
cych swego rodzaju komputerami sprawdzajÄ
podpisy na programach "
@@ -388,26 +460,29 @@
"wiÄc de facto program jest niewolny."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Wiele produktów Android zawiera niewolne tiwoizowane pliki wykonywalne "
"Linuksa, nawet jeÅli licencja kodu źródÅowego jest GNU GPL w wersji
2. "
"ZaprojektowaliÅmy GNU GPL w wersji 3, aby temu zapobiec."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Kryteria otwartego oprogramowania zwracajÄ
uwagÄ tylko na licencjÄ
kodu "
-"źródÅowego. Te niewolne pliki wykonywalne, gdy sÄ
tworzone z kodu "
-"źródÅowego takiego jak Linux, który jest otwartym i wolnym "
-"oprogramowaniem, sÄ
wprawdzie otwarte ale nie sÄ
wolne."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pot 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.58
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pot 3 Feb 2022 02:33:14 -0000 1.59
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
@@ -161,47 +161,57 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
-"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
-"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
-"a free license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the "
-"executable is de-facto nonfree."
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as "
+"“open source,” because its source code is available that way. "
+"That causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is "
+"open source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.75
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -b -r1.75 -r1.76
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000
1.75
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:14 -0000
1.76
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-12-31 07:58-0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafael Fontenelle <rafaelff@gnome.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <www-pt-br-general@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -250,15 +250,21 @@
msgstr "Diferenças práticas entre Software Livre e Código Aberto"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"Na prática, o código aberto apoia critérios um pouco mais flexÃveis que
os "
"do software livre. Até onde sabemos, todos os códigos abertos de software "
@@ -272,15 +278,61 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"Na prática, o código aberto apoia critérios um pouco mais flexÃveis que
os "
+"do software livre. Até onde sabemos, todos os códigos abertos de software "
+"livre lançados se qualificariam como código aberto. Quase todos os
softwares "
+"de código aberto são software livre, mas há exceções. Primeiro, algumas "
+"licenças de código aberto são restritivas demais, de forma que elas não
se "
+"qualificam como licenças livres. Por exemplo, a âOpen Watcomâ é não
livre "
+"porque sua licença não permite fazer uma versão modificada e usá-la de
forma "
+"privada. Por sorte, poucos programas usam tais licenças."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Os critérios de código aberto se preocupam unicamente com o licenciamento
do "
+"código aberto. Então, esses executáveis não livres, quando feitos a
partir "
+"de código aberto como o Linux, que é um código aberto e livre, são
códigos "
+"abertos, porém não livres."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Se esses executáveis corresponderem totalmente aos fontes lançados, eles se
"
"qualificam como código aberto, mas não como software livre. No entanto, "
@@ -288,16 +340,27 @@
"distribuir executáveis livres."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Finalmente, e mais importante na prática, muitos produtos contendo "
"computadores verificam assinaturas em seus programas executáveis para "
@@ -311,26 +374,23 @@
"livre de-facto."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Muitos produtos Android contêm executáveis tivoizados não livres do Linux,
"
"mesmo que seu código-fonte esteja sob a versão 2 da GNU GPL. Projetamos a "
"versão 3 da GNU GPL para proibir essa prática."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Os critérios de código aberto se preocupam unicamente com o licenciamento
do "
-"código aberto. Então, esses executáveis não livres, quando feitos a
partir "
-"de código aberto como o Linux, que é um código aberto e livre, são
códigos "
-"abertos, porém não livres."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ro-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ro-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000
1.13
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ro-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:14 -0000
1.14
@@ -136,40 +136,57 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. For example, <span class="removed"><del><strong>“Open
Watcom”</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open
Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. For example, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“Open Watcom”</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, when a <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free</em></ins></span>
program's source code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
+<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria for open source
are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe an
+executable as “open source,” because its source code is
+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical situations
+where the source code is open source (and free) but the executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is</em></ins></span> when a
program's source code
+carries a weak <span class="inserted"><ins><em>free</em></ins></span> license,
one without copyleft, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>but</em></ins></span> its
executables <span class="removed"><del><strong>can</strong></del></span>
+carry additional nonfree conditions. <span class="removed"><del><strong><a
href="https://code.visualstudio.com/License/">Microsoft
does this with Visual Studio,</a> for example.</p>
-<p>If</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>If</em></ins></span> these executables <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fully</strong></del></span> correspond <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exactly</em></ins></span> to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to make and
-distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
-computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
-where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
+<p>If these</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Supposing the</em></ins></span> executables <span
class="removed"><del><strong>fully</strong></del></span>
+correspond <span class="inserted"><ins><em>exactly</em></ins></span> to the
released <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources, they
+qualify as open source but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>sources—which may or may</em></ins></span> not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>as free software. However, in that
+case users</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>be so—users</em></ins></span> can
compile the source code to make and distribute
+free
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>executables.</p>
+
+<p>Finally,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is
no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>most important in practice,
many</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>important.
Many</em></ins></span> products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>effectively using</em></ins></span> different
executables; only one
+privileged company can make executables that can run in the device <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or can access</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+use</em></ins></span> its full capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw
+it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, and
+nominally carries a free license, the users cannot <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usefully</em></ins></span> run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.</p>
<p>Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
-Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice.</p>
+Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>We</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>(We</em></ins></span>
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this <span
class="removed"><del><strong>practice.</p>
<p>The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the
-licensing of the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not free.</p>
+licensing of the source code. Thus, these nonfree</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These</em></ins></span> executables, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>when</strong></del></span> made from source code
<span class="removed"><del><strong>such as Linux</strong></del></span> that is
+open source and free, are
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>open source</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken of as “open
+source,”</em></ins></span> but <span class="removed"><del><strong>not
free.</p></strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>they are
<em>not</em> free software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -547,7 +564,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:09 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:14 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.58
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:15 -0000 1.59
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-06-04 20:13+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Denis Cherean <denis.cherean@gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <web-translators-ro@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -322,11 +322,11 @@
# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
-# | is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
-# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
-# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
-# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+# | For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
+# | not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately,
+# | few programs use such licenses.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
@@ -341,11 +341,42 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
+msgstr ""
+"Ãn practicÄ, conceptul de sursÄ deschisÄ reprezintÄ criterii puÈin mai
largi "
+"decât cele ale software-ului liber. Din câte Ètim, tot codul sursÄ
publicat "
+"drept software liber ar putea fi calificat drept sursÄ deschisÄ. Aproape
tot "
+"codul de tip sursÄ deschisÄ e software liber, dar existÄ excepÈii. Ãn
primul "
+"rând, unele licenÈe sursÄ deschisÄ sunt prea restrictive pentru a putea
fi "
+"clasificate drept licenÈe libere. De exemplu, âOpen Watcomâ este neliber
"
+"deoarece licenÈa acestuia nu permite crearea unei versiuni modificate Èi "
+"folosirea acesteia in privat. Din fericire, puÈine programe folosesc astfel "
+"de licenÈe."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, [-“Open Watcom”-] {+Open Watcom+} is nonfree
+# | because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it
+# | privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Ãn practicÄ, conceptul de sursÄ deschisÄ reprezintÄ criterii puÈin mai
largi "
"decât cele ale software-ului liber. Din câte Ètim, tot codul sursÄ
publicat "
@@ -358,23 +389,52 @@
"de licenÈe."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | {+Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one
-# | without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-# | conditions.+} If these executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to
-# | the released sources, they qualify as open source but not as free
-# | software. However, in that case users can compile the source code to make
-# | and distribute free executables.
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Criteriile sursei deschise se preocupÄ Ã®n mod exclusiv cu licenÈierea "
+"codului sursÄ. Astfel, aceste fiÈiere executabile care nu pot fi
modificate, "
+"când sunt realizate din cod sursÄ precum Linux care e de tip sursÄ
deschisÄ "
+"Èi liber, sunt de tip sursÄ deschisÄ dar nu libere."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-If these-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source
+# | code carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its
+# | executables carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the+}
+# | executables [-fully-] correspond {+exactly+} to the released [-sources,
+# | they qualify as open source but-] {+sources—which may or may+} not
+# | [-as free software. However, in that case users-] {+be so—users+}
+# | can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables.
+# | {+That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave problem.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"DacÄ aceste fiÈiere executabile correspund în întregime codului sursÄ "
"publicat, atunci ele pot fi descrise ca drept sursÄ deschisÄ dar nu ca Èi "
@@ -382,16 +442,17 @@
"pentru a produce Èi a distribui fiÈiere executabile libere."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing
-# | computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-# | from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-# | make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-# | capabilities. We call these devices [-“tyrants”,-]
-# | {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is called
-# | “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it.
-# | Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally
-# | carries a free license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so
-# | the executable is de-facto nonfree.
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices
+# | [-“tyrants”,-] {+“tyrants,”+} and the practice is
+# | called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first
+# | saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, and
+# | nominally carries a free license, the users cannot {+usefully+} run
+# | modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
@@ -404,15 +465,15 @@
#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Ãn ultimul rând, Èi cel mai important în practicÄ, multe programe
conÈîn "
"metode de verificare a calculatorului utilizatorului pentru a-l bloca pe "
@@ -425,26 +486,29 @@
"executabilul e neliber."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Multe produse Android conÈin fiÈiere executabile nelibere, tivoizate de la "
"Linux, chiar dacÄ codul sursÄ este licenÈiat sub LPG GNU, versiunea 2. Noi
"
"am conceput LPG GNU versiunea 3 pentru a interzice aceastÄ practicÄ."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Criteriile sursei deschise se preocupÄ Ã®n mod exclusiv cu licenÈierea "
-"codului sursÄ. Astfel, aceste fiÈiere executabile care nu pot fi
modificate, "
-"când sunt realizate din cod sursÄ precum Linux care e de tip sursÄ
deschisÄ "
-"Èi liber, sunt de tip sursÄ deschisÄ dar nu libere."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.135
retrieving revision 1.136
diff -u -b -r1.135 -r1.136
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 2 Feb 2022 15:42:25 -0000 1.135
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:16 -0000 1.136
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2022-02-02 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <ineiev@gnu.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <www-ru-list@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -267,15 +268,29 @@
"ÑекÑÑом"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of
+# | free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions. [-First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow
+# | making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few
+# | programs use such licenses.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"Ðа пÑакÑике оÑкÑÑÑÑй иÑÑ
однÑй ÑекÑÑ
ознаÑÐ°ÐµÑ Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ более ÑлабÑе кÑиÑеÑии, "
"Ñем кÑиÑеÑии ÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм.
ÐаÑколÑко Ð¼Ñ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÐµÐ¼, вÑе ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑие "
@@ -288,12 +303,93 @@
"полÑзованиÑ. Ð ÑÑаÑÑÑÑ, пÑогÑамм Ñ Ñакими
лиÑензиÑми мало."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+# | [-In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those
+# | of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software
+# | source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software
+# | is free software, but there are exceptions.-]First, some open source
+# | licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses.
+# | For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow
+# | making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few
+# | programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"Ðа пÑакÑике оÑкÑÑÑÑй иÑÑ
однÑй ÑекÑÑ
ознаÑÐ°ÐµÑ Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ более ÑлабÑе кÑиÑеÑии, "
+"Ñем кÑиÑеÑии ÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм.
ÐаÑколÑко Ð¼Ñ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÐµÐ¼, вÑе ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑие "
+"опÑбликованнÑе иÑÑ
однÑе ÑекÑÑÑ ÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм можно бÑло Ð±Ñ ÑаÑÑениваÑÑ "
+"как пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ñ Ð¾ÑкÑÑÑÑм иÑÑ
однÑм
ÑекÑÑом. ÐоÑÑи вÑе пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ñ Ð¾ÑкÑÑÑÑм "
+"иÑÑ
однÑм ÑекÑÑом ÑвободнÑ, но еÑÑÑ
иÑклÑÑениÑ. Ðо-пеÑвÑÑ
, некоÑоÑÑе лиÑензии "
+"оÑкÑÑÑого иÑÑ
одного ÑекÑÑа ÑлиÑком
жеÑÑки, Ñак ÑÑо они не могÑÑ ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ "
+"лиÑензиÑми ÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм. ÐапÑимеÑ,
Open Watcom неÑвободен, поÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ ÑÑо "
+"его лиÑÐµÐ½Ð·Ð¸Ñ Ð½Ðµ допÑÑÐºÐ°ÐµÑ Ð¸Ð·Ð³Ð¾Ñовление
измененнÑÑ
веÑÑий Ð´Ð»Ñ ÑаÑÑного "
+"полÑзованиÑ. Ð ÑÑаÑÑÑÑ, пÑогÑамм Ñ Ñакими
лиÑензиÑми мало."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-The-]{+Second, the+} criteria for open source are concerned solely with
+# | the licensing of the source code. [-Thus, these nonfree executables, when
+# | made from-] {+However, people often describe an executable as “open
+# | source,” because its+} source code [-such as Linux that-] is
+# | [-open-] {+available that way. That causes confusion in paradoxical
+# | situations where the+} source [-and free, are-] {+code is+} open source
+# | {+(and free)+} but [-not free.-] {+the executable itself is nonfree.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"ÐÑиÑеÑии оÑкÑÑÑого ÑекÑÑа ÑаÑÑмаÑÑиваÑÑ
ÑолÑко лиÑензиÑование иÑÑ
одного "
+"ÑекÑÑа. Таким обÑазом, когда ÑÑи
неÑвободнÑе иÑполнÑемÑе ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð»Ñ Ð´ÐµÐ»Ð°ÑÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð· "
+"иÑÑ
одного ÑекÑÑа ÑакиÑ
пÑогÑамм,
одновÑеменно Ñ Ð¾ÑкÑÑÑÑм иÑÑ
однÑм ÑекÑÑом и
"
+"ÑвободнÑÑ
, как Linux, они пÑедÑÑавлÑÑÑ
пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ñ Ð¾ÑкÑÑÑÑм иÑÑ
однÑм "
+"ÑекÑÑом, но не ÑвободнÑе. Ðногие пÑодÑкÑÑ
на базе Android ÑодеÑÐ¶Ð°Ñ "
+"неÑвободнÑе ÑивоизованнÑе иÑполнÑемÑе
ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð»Ñ Linux."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Second,-]{+The trivial case of this paradox is+} when a [-free-]
+# | program's source code carries a weak {+free+} license, one without
+# | copyleft, {+but+} its executables [-can-] carry additional nonfree
+# | conditions. [-If these-] {+Supposing the+} executables correspond
+# | exactly to the released [-sources, they qualify as open source but-]
+# | {+sources—which may or may+} not [-as free software. However, in
+# | that case users-] {+be so—users+} can compile the source code to
+# | make and distribute free executables. {+That's why this case is trivial;
+# | it is no grave problem.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
+#| "without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree "
+#| "conditions. If these executables correspond exactly to the released "
+#| "sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software. However, "
+#| "in that case users can compile the source code to make and distribute "
+#| "free executables."
+msgid ""
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Ðалее, когда иÑÑ
однÑй ÑекÑÑ Ñвободной
пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанÑеÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ Ñлабой "
"лиÑензии, Ñ.е. без лиÑензии авÑоÑÑкого
лева, иÑполнÑемÑе ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð»Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ "
@@ -304,16 +400,38 @@
"ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанÑÑÑ ÑвободнÑе иÑполнÑемÑе
ÑайлÑ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+# | [-Finally,-]{+The nontrivial case is harmful+} and [-most important in
+# | practice, many-] {+important. Many+} products containing computers check
+# | signatures on their executable programs to block users from [-installing-]
+# | {+effectively using+} different executables; only one privileged company
+# | can make executables that can run in the device [-or can access-] {+and
+# | use+} its full capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,”
+# | and the practice is called “tivoization” after the product
+# | (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
+# | source code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot
+# | {+usefully+} run modified versions of it, so the executable is de-facto
+# | nonfree.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"ÐаконеÑ, ÑÑо на пÑакÑике важнее вÑего,
многие пÑодÑкÑÑ, ÑодеÑжаÑие "
"компÑÑÑеÑÑ, пÑовеÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´Ð¿Ð¸Ñи на ÑайлаÑ
иÑполнÑемÑÑ
ими пÑогÑамм и не даÑÑ "
@@ -328,28 +446,29 @@
"ÑакÑиÑеÑки неÑвободен."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even
+# | though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. {+(+}We designed GNU
+# | GPL version 3 to prohibit this [-practice.-] {+practice; too bad Linux did
+# | not adopt it.) These executables, made from source code that is open
+# | source and free, are generally spoken of as “open source,” but
+# | they are <em>not</em> free software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Ðногие пÑодÑкÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ Android ÑодеÑжаÑ
неÑвободнÑе ÑивоизованнÑе иÑполнÑемÑе "
"ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð»Ñ Linux, неÑмоÑÑÑ Ð½Ð° Ñо ÑÑо его иÑÑ
однÑй
ÑекÑÑ ÑаÑпÑоÑÑÑанÑеÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð´ GNU "
"GPL веÑÑии 2. ЧÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð·Ð°Ð¿ÑеÑиÑÑ ÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑакÑикÑ,
Ð¼Ñ ÑоÑÑавили GNU GPL веÑÑии 3."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"ÐÑиÑеÑии оÑкÑÑÑого ÑекÑÑа ÑаÑÑмаÑÑиваÑÑ
ÑолÑко лиÑензиÑование иÑÑ
одного "
-"ÑекÑÑа. Таким обÑазом, когда ÑÑи
неÑвободнÑе иÑполнÑемÑе ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð»Ñ Ð´ÐµÐ»Ð°ÑÑÑÑ Ð¸Ð· "
-"иÑÑ
одного ÑекÑÑа ÑакиÑ
пÑогÑамм,
одновÑеменно Ñ Ð¾ÑкÑÑÑÑм иÑÑ
однÑм ÑекÑÑом и
"
-"ÑвободнÑÑ
, как Linux, они пÑедÑÑавлÑÑÑ
пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ñ Ð¾ÑкÑÑÑÑм иÑÑ
однÑм "
-"ÑекÑÑом, но не ÑвободнÑе. Ðногие пÑодÑкÑÑ
на базе Android ÑодеÑÐ¶Ð°Ñ "
-"неÑвободнÑе ÑивоизованнÑе иÑполнÑемÑе
ÑÐ°Ð¹Ð»Ñ Linux."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.102
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -b -r1.102 -r1.103
--- open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:09 -0000 1.102
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:16 -0000 1.103
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2022-01-01 18:39+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <besnik@programeshqip.org>\n"
"Language-Team: \n"
@@ -243,15 +243,21 @@
msgstr "Dallime Praktike mes Software-it të Lirë dhe Burimit të Hapët"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"Në praktikë, burimi i hapët mishëron kritere paksa më të hapërdarë se
sa ata "
"të software-it të lirë. Me aq sa dimë, krejt kodi <em>software</em> i
lirë "
@@ -266,15 +272,62 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"Në praktikë, burimi i hapët mishëron kritere paksa më të hapërdarë se
sa ata "
+"të software-it të lirë. Me aq sa dimë, krejt kodi <em>software</em> i
lirë "
+"i hedhur në qarkullim mund të kualifikohet si me burim të hapët. Thuajse
"
+"krejt software-i me burim të hapët është <em>software</em> i lirë, por
ka "
+"përjashtime. Së pari, disa licenca burimi të hapët janë shumë
kufizuese, "
+"ndaj nuk kualifikohen dot si licenca të lira. Për shembull, âOpen
Watcomâ "
+"sâështë e lirë, pasi licenca e saj nuk lejon krijimin e një versioni
të "
+"modifikuar dhe përdorimin e tij privatisht. Për fat, licenca të tilla "
+"përdoren nga pak programe."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Kriteri për burim të hapët shqetësohet vetëm për licencimin e kodit
burim. "
+"Ndaj, këta të ekzekutueshëm jo të lirë, kur krijohen nga kod burim të
tillë "
+"si Linux-i, që është me burim të hapët dhe i lirë, janë me burim të
hapët, "
+"por jo të lirë."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Nëse këta të ekzekutueshëm u përgjigjen plotësisht burimeve të hedhura
në "
"qarkullim, kualifikohen për burim të hapët, por jo si software i lirë. "
@@ -282,16 +335,27 @@
"ndërtuar dhe shpërndarë të ekzekutueshëm të lirë."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Së fundi, dhe çâështë më e rëndësishmja në praktikë, mjaft
produkte që "
"përmbajnë kompjutera, kontrollojnë nënshkrimet në programe të tyre të "
@@ -306,26 +370,23 @@
"ekzekutueshmi është jo i lirë."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Mjaft produkte Android përmbajnë të ekzekutueshëm Linux jo të lirë të
Tivo-"
"izuar, edhe pse kodi i tij burimi gjendet nën GNU GPL version 2. Versionin "
"3 të GNU GPL-së e konceptuam për ta ndaluar këtë praktikë."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Kriteri për burim të hapët shqetësohet vetëm për licencimin e kodit
burim. "
-"Ndaj, këta të ekzekutueshëm jo të lirë, kur krijohen nga kod burim të
tillë "
-"si Linux-i, që është me burim të hapët dhe i lirë, janë me burim të
hapët, "
-"por jo të lirë."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:10 -0000 1.17
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:16 -0000 1.18
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <web-translators@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -383,47 +383,57 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
+"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.71
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -b -r1.71 -r1.72
--- open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:10 -0000 1.71
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:16 -0000 1.72
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2022-01-10 20:35+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: T. E. Kalayci <tekrei@member.fsf.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <www-tr-comm@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -244,15 +244,21 @@
msgstr "Ãzgür Yazılım ve Açık Kaynak Arasındaki Pratik Farklılıklar"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"Uygulamada açık kaynak, özgür yazılımınkinden biraz daha gevÅek
kriterleri "
"ifade ediyor. BildiÄimiz kadarıyla mevcut tüm özgür yazılım kaynak
kodları, "
@@ -266,15 +272,61 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"Uygulamada açık kaynak, özgür yazılımınkinden biraz daha gevÅek
kriterleri "
+"ifade ediyor. BildiÄimiz kadarıyla mevcut tüm özgür yazılım kaynak
kodları, "
+"açık kaynak niteliÄindedir. Neredeyse tüm açık kaynak yazılımlar
özgür bir "
+"yazılımdır ancak istisnalar da vardır. İlk olarak bazı açık kaynak
lisanslar "
+"çok kısıtlayıcı olduÄundan özgür lisans olarak nitelendirilmiyorlar. "
+"ÃrneÄin; Open Watcom özgür deÄildir çünkü lisansı deÄiÅtirilmiÅ
bir sürüm "
+"oluÅturulmasına ve özel olarak kullanılmasına izin vermez. Neyse ki
birkaç "
+"program bu tür lisansları kullanmaktadır."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"Açık kaynak için kriterler yalnızca kaynak kodunun lisanslanması ile "
+"ilgilidir. Bu nedenle bu özgür olmayan çalıÅtırılabilir dosyalar;
açık "
+"kaynak ve özgür olan Linux gibi kaynak kodlarından yapıldıÄında açık
"
+"kaynaktır fakat özgür deÄildir."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"Bu çalıÅtırılabilir dosyalar yayımlanan kaynaklara tam olarak
karÅılık "
"gelirse açık kaynak olarak nitelendirilir ancak özgür yazılım
deÄildir. "
@@ -282,16 +334,27 @@
"daÄıtmak için kaynak kodu derleyebilir."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Son olarak ve uygulamada en önemlisi; bilgisayar içeren birçok ürün, "
"kullanıcıların farklı çalıÅtırılabilir dosyaları yüklemelerini
engellemek "
@@ -304,26 +367,23 @@
"çalıÅtıramazlar, böylece çalıÅtırılabilir dosya fiilen özgür
deÄildir."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"Birçok Android ürünü, kaynak kodu GNU GPL versiyon 2 altında olsa bile "
"Linux'un özgür olmayan tivolaÅmıŠçalıÅtırılabilir dosyalarını
içerir. Bu "
"uygulamayı yasaklamak için GNU GPL versiyon 3'ü tasarladık."
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"Açık kaynak için kriterler yalnızca kaynak kodunun lisanslanması ile "
-"ilgilidir. Bu nedenle bu özgür olmayan çalıÅtırılabilir dosyalar;
açık "
-"kaynak ve özgür olan Linux gibi kaynak kodlarından yapıldıÄında açık
"
-"kaynaktır fakat özgür deÄildir."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html 2 Feb 2022 13:42:11 -0000
1.19
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.uk-diff.html 3 Feb 2022 02:33:17 -0000
1.20
@@ -138,39 +138,50 @@
<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
-source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
-some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
-as free licenses. For example, <span class="removed"><del><strong>“Open
Watcom”</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open
Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
+source software is free software, but there are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>exceptions. First,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>exceptions.</p>
+
+<p>First,</em></ins></span> some open source licenses are too
restrictive, so they do
+not qualify as free licenses. For example, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“Open Watcom”</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Open Watcom</em></ins></span> is nonfree
because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
-<p>Second, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>when a free program's source
code carries a weak license,
-one without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree
-conditions. If these executables correspond exactly to the released
-sources, they qualify as open source but not as free software.
-However, in that case users can compile the source code to
make</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>more</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>distribute free executables.</p>
-
-<p>Finally, and most</em></ins></span> important in practice, many
products containing
-computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
-from installing different executables; only one privileged company can
-make executables that can run in the device or can access its full
-capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and the
-practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo)
-where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free
-source code, <span class="inserted"><ins><em>and nominally carries a free
license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot
-run modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables of
-Linux, even though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We
-designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this
practice.</p></em></ins></span>
-
-<p>The criteria for open source <span class="removed"><del><strong>do
not recognize this issue; they</strong></del></span> are concerned solely with
the
-licensing of the source code. Thus, these
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>nonfree</em></ins></span> executables, when
-made from source code such as Linux that is open source and free, are
-open source but not <span class="removed"><del><strong>free. Many
-Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of
Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>free.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Second, <span class="removed"><del><strong>and more
important</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the criteria
for open source are concerned solely with the
+licensing of the source code. However, people often describe an
+executable as “open source,” because its source code is
+available that way. That causes confusion</em></ins></span> in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>practice, many</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>paradoxical situations
+where the source code is open source (and free) but the executable
+itself is nonfree.</p>
+
+<p>The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code
+carries a weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables
+carry additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables
+correspond exactly to the released sources—which may or may not
+be so—users can compile the source code to make and distribute
+free executables. That's why this case is trivial; it is no grave
+problem.</p>
+
+<p>The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many</em></ins></span>
products
+containing computers check signatures on their executable programs to
+block users from <span
class="removed"><del><strong>installing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>effectively using</em></ins></span> different
executables; only one
+privileged company can make executables that can run in the device <span
class="removed"><del><strong>or can access</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+use</em></ins></span> its full capabilities. We call these devices <span
class="removed"><del><strong>“tyrants”,</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>“tyrants,”</em></ins></span> and
the practice is called
+“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw
+it. Even if the executable is made from free source code, <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>and
+nominally carries a free license,</em></ins></span> the users cannot <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usefully</em></ins></span> run
+modified versions of it, so the executable is <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>de-facto</em></ins></span> nonfree.</p>
+
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>The criteria for open source do
not recognize this issue; they are
+concerned solely with the licensing</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Many Android products contain nonfree
tivoized executables</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Linux, even though its</em></ins></span>
source <span class="removed"><del><strong>code. Thus, these
+unmodifiable</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>code is
under GNU GPL version 2. (We
+designed GNU GPL version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux
+did not adopt it.) These</em></ins></span> executables, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>when</strong></del></span> made from source code
<span class="removed"><del><strong>such as Linux</strong></del></span> that is
+open source and free, are <span class="removed"><del><strong>open source but
not free. Many
+Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>generally spoken</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>as “open
+source,” but they are <em>not</em> free
software.</p></em></ins></span>
<h3>Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and
“Open Source”</h3>
@@ -546,7 +557,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2022/02/02 13:42:11 $
+$Date: 2022/02/03 02:33:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:11 -0000 1.58
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:17 -0000 1.59
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-08-04 07:30+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Andriy Bandura <andriykopanytsia@gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian <>\n"
@@ -301,11 +301,7 @@
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"Ðа пÑакÑиÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑий виÑ
Ñдний ÑекÑÑ
ознаÑÐ°Ñ ÑÑоÑ
и ÑлабÑÑ ÐºÑиÑеÑÑÑ, Ñим "
"кÑиÑеÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑниÑ
пÑогÑам. ÐаÑкÑлÑки ми
знаÑмо, вÑÑ ÑÑнÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами "
@@ -318,12 +314,61 @@
"заÑÑоÑовÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð² багаÑÑоÑ
пÑогÑамаÑ
."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its "
+#| "license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+#| "Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"Ðа пÑакÑиÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑий виÑ
Ñдний ÑекÑÑ
ознаÑÐ°Ñ ÑÑоÑ
и ÑлабÑÑ ÐºÑиÑеÑÑÑ, Ñим "
+"кÑиÑеÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑниÑ
пÑогÑам. ÐаÑкÑлÑки ми
знаÑмо, вÑÑ ÑÑнÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами "
+"можна бÑло б ÑозÑÑнÑваÑи Ñк пÑогÑами з
вÑдкÑиÑим виÑ
Ñдним кодом. Ðайже вÑÑ "
+"пÑогÑами з вÑдкÑиÑим виÑ
Ñдним кодом
вÑлÑнÑ, але Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ð½ÑÑки. Ðо-пеÑÑе, деÑÐºÑ "
+"лÑÑензÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑого виÑ
Ñдного кодÑ
занадÑо жоÑÑÑкÑ, ÑÐ¾Ð¼Ñ Ð²Ð¾Ð½Ð¸ не можÑÑÑ "
+"вважаÑиÑÑ Ð»ÑÑензÑÑми вÑлÑниÑ
пÑогÑам.
ÐапÑиклад, “Open Watcom” Ñ "
+"невÑлÑноÑ, бо ÑÑ Ð»ÑÑензÑÑ Ð½Ðµ дозволÑÑ
зÑобиÑи модиÑÑÐºÐ¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð²ÐµÑÑÑÑ Ñ "
+"викоÑиÑÑовÑваÑи ÑÑ
Ñ Ð¿ÑиваÑномÑ
поÑÑдкÑ.Ðа ÑаÑÑÑ, ÑÑ Ð»ÑÑензÑÑ Ð½Ðµ "
+"заÑÑоÑовÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð² багаÑÑоÑ
пÑогÑамаÑ
."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
+#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
+#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
+#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
+#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"ÐÑиÑеÑÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑого ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ñ Ð½Ðµ визнаÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑ
пÑоблеми; вони ÑозглÑдаÑÑÑ ÑÑлÑки "
+"лÑÑензÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ñ
Ñдного кодÑ. Таким Ñином,
коли ÑÑ Ð´Ð²ÑÐ¹ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ñ Ñайли, ÑÐºÑ Ð½Ðµ "
+"можна змÑнÑваÑи, ÑоблÑÑÑÑÑ Ð· виÑ
Ñдного
ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ñ ÑакиÑ
пÑогÑам Ñк Linux, вони "
+"пÑедÑÑавлÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑами з вÑдкÑиÑим виÑ
Ñдним кодом, але не вÑлÑнÑ. ÐагаÑо "
+"пÑодÑкÑи на Ð±Ð°Ð·Ñ Android мÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ²ÑлÑнÑ
ÑÑвоÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ñайли Linux."
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+msgid ""
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
@@ -339,15 +384,15 @@
#| "code, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
#| "nonfree."
msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"Ðо-дÑÑге, Ñо на пÑакÑиÑÑ Ð±ÑлÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ð¶Ð»Ð¸Ð²Ð¾,
багаÑо пÑодÑкÑи, Ñо мÑÑÑÑÑÑ "
"комп'ÑÑеÑи, пеÑевÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑдпиÑи на ÑайлаÑ
виконÑваниÑ
ними пÑогÑам Ñ Ð½Ðµ "
@@ -363,29 +408,13 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The criteria for open source do not recognize this issue; they are "
-#| "concerned solely with the licensing of the source code. Thus, these "
-#| "unmodifiable executables, when made from source code such as Linux that "
-#| "is open source and free, are open source but not free. Many Android "
-#| "products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux."
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"ÐÑиÑеÑÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑого ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ñ Ð½Ðµ визнаÑÑÑ ÑÑÑÑ
пÑоблеми; вони ÑозглÑдаÑÑÑ ÑÑлÑки "
-"лÑÑензÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸Ñ
Ñдного кодÑ. Таким Ñином,
коли ÑÑ Ð´Ð²ÑÐ¹ÐºÐ¾Ð²Ñ Ñайли, ÑÐºÑ Ð½Ðµ "
-"можна змÑнÑваÑи, ÑоблÑÑÑÑÑ Ð· виÑ
Ñдного
ÐºÐ¾Ð´Ñ ÑакиÑ
пÑогÑам Ñк Linux, вони "
-"пÑедÑÑавлÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑами з вÑдкÑиÑим виÑ
Ñдним кодом, але не вÑлÑнÑ. ÐагаÑо "
-"пÑодÑкÑи на Ð±Ð°Ð·Ñ Android мÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð½ÐµÐ²ÑлÑнÑ
ÑÑвоÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ð²Ð¸ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ñ Ñайли Linux."
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.89
retrieving revision 1.90
diff -u -b -r1.89 -r1.90
--- open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 2 Feb 2022 13:42:11 -0000
1.89
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 3 Feb 2022 02:33:17 -0000
1.90
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 1.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-02 13:28+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2022-02-03 02:27+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2021-12-31 09:21+0800\n"
"Last-Translator: Wensheng Xie <wxie@member.fsf.org>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese <www-zh-cn-translators@gnu.org>\n"
@@ -215,15 +215,21 @@
msgstr "å®è·µä¸ï¼å¼æºä¸èªç±è½¯ä»¶çåºå«"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
msgid ""
"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
-"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
-"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
-"example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"is free software, but there are exceptions."
msgstr ""
"å¨å®è·µä¸ï¼å¼æºçè¦æ±æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶å®½æ¾ä¸äºãæ®æ们æç¥ï¼è¿ä»åå¸çèªç±è½¯ä»¶æºä»£ç
"
"é½æ¯å¼æºè½¯ä»¶ã尽管大å¤æ°å¼æºè½¯ä»¶ä¹åæ
·æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶ï¼ä½ä¼æä¸äºä¾å¤ãé¦å
ï¼æäº"
@@ -234,30 +240,82 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+#| "source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source "
+#| "software is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open "
+#| "source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free "
+#| "licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license does "
+#| "not allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, "
+#| "few programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify "
+"as free licenses. For example, Open Watcom is nonfree because its license "
+"does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. "
+"Fortunately, few programs use such licenses."
+msgstr ""
+"å¨å®è·µä¸ï¼å¼æºçè¦æ±æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶å®½æ¾ä¸äºãæ®æ们æç¥ï¼è¿ä»åå¸çèªç±è½¯ä»¶æºä»£ç
"
+"é½æ¯å¼æºè½¯ä»¶ã尽管大å¤æ°å¼æºè½¯ä»¶ä¹åæ
·æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶ï¼ä½ä¼æä¸äºä¾å¤ãé¦å
ï¼æäº"
+"å¼æºè®¸å¯è¯å¯¹ç¨æ·è¿äºèå»ï¼å®ä»¬å°±æ²¡æ被å为èªç±è½¯ä»¶ãæ¯å¦ï¼Open
Watcom å°±éèª"
+"ç±çï¼å 为å
¶è®¸å¯è¯ä¸å
许修æ¹è¯¥è½¯ä»¶åç§èªä½¿ç¨è¯¥è½¯ä»¶ã幸è¿çæ¯ï¼å¾å°è½¯ä»¶ä¼ä½¿ç¨"
+"è¿äºè®¸å¯è¯ã"
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of "
+#| "the source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source "
+#| "code such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not "
+#| "free."
+msgid ""
+"Second, the criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing "
+"of the source code. However, people often describe an executable as “"
+"open source,” because its source code is available that way. That "
+"causes confusion in paradoxical situations where the source code is open "
+"source (and free) but the executable itself is nonfree."
+msgstr ""
+"å¼æºçæ å没ææè¯å°è¿ä¸ªé®é¢ï¼å®ä»¬åªå
³å¿æºä»£ç
ç许å¯è¯ãè¿æ ·ä»¥æ¥ï¼è¿äºç¼è¯èª"
+"诸å¦Linuxçå¼æºåèªç±è½¯ä»¶çå¯æ§è¡æ件ï¼åå°æªå¨ï¼æ¯å¼æºçï¼ä½ä¸æ¯èªç±çã"
+
+#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
#| "If these executables fully correspond to the released sources, they "
#| "qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
#| "users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
msgid ""
-"Second, when a free program's source code carries a weak license, one "
-"without copyleft, its executables can carry additional nonfree conditions. "
-"If these executables correspond exactly to the released sources, they "
-"qualify as open source but not as free software. However, in that case "
-"users can compile the source code to make and distribute free executables."
+"The trivial case of this paradox is when a program's source code carries a "
+"weak free license, one without copyleft, but its executables carry "
+"additional nonfree conditions. Supposing the executables correspond exactly "
+"to the released sources—which may or may not be so—users can "
+"compile the source code to make and distribute free executables. That's why "
+"this case is trivial; it is no grave problem."
msgstr ""
"å¦æè¿äºå¯æ§è¡æ件å®å
¨ååå¸çæºä»£ç
对åºï¼é£ä¹å®ä»¬æ¯åæ ¼çå¼æºè½¯ä»¶ï¼ä½ä¸æ¯èª"
"ç±è½¯ä»¶ãä¸è¿ï¼å¨è¿ç§æ
åµä¸ï¼ç¨æ·å¯ä»¥ç¼è¯æºä»£ç
æ¥å¶ä½ååå¸å¯æ§è¡æ件ã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing computers "
-"check signatures on their executable programs to block users from installing "
-"different executables; only one privileged company can make executables that "
-"can run in the device or can access its full capabilities. We call these "
-"devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called “"
-"tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. Even if "
-"the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries a free "
-"license, the users cannot run modified versions of it, so the executable is "
-"de-facto nonfree."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Finally, and most important in practice, many products containing "
+#| "computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users "
+#| "from installing different executables; only one privileged company can "
+#| "make executables that can run in the device or can access its full "
+#| "capabilities. We call these devices “tyrants,” and the "
+#| "practice is called “tivoization” after the product (Tivo) "
+#| "where we first saw it. Even if the executable is made from free source "
+#| "code, and nominally carries a free license, the users cannot run modified "
+#| "versions of it, so the executable is de-facto nonfree."
+msgid ""
+"The nontrivial case is harmful and important. Many products containing "
+"computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users from "
+"effectively using different executables; only one privileged company can "
+"make executables that can run in the device and use its full capabilities. "
+"We call these devices “tyrants,” and the practice is called "
+"“tivoization” after the product (Tivo) where we first saw it. "
+"Even if the executable is made from free source code, and nominally carries "
+"a free license, the users cannot usefully run modified versions of it, so "
+"the executable is de-facto nonfree."
msgstr ""
"æåï¼å®é
æä½æ¶è¿ææéè¦çä¸ç¹ï¼å¾å¤äº§å带ææ£æµå¯æ§è¡æ件ç¾ååè½ç计ç®"
"æºï¼å®ä¼ç¦æ¢ç¨æ·å®è£
å¦å¤ä¸åçå¯æ§è¡æ件ï¼èåªæä¸å®¶ç¹æå
¬å¸æè½ç产å¯æ§è¡æ"
@@ -268,23 +326,22 @@
"æ件ä¸æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶ã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
+#| "though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
+#| "version 3 to prohibit this practice."
msgid ""
"Many Android products contain nonfree tivoized executables of Linux, even "
-"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. We designed GNU GPL "
-"version 3 to prohibit this practice."
+"though its source code is under GNU GPL version 2. (We designed GNU GPL "
+"version 3 to prohibit this practice; too bad Linux did not adopt it.) These "
+"executables, made from source code that is open source and free, are "
+"generally spoken of as “open source,” but they are <em>not</em> "
+"free software."
msgstr ""
"许å¤Android产åå°±å
å«éèªç±Linuxå¯æ§è¡æ件ï¼tivoizationï¼ï¼å³ä½¿å
¶æºä»£ç æ¯æ"
"ç
§ GNU GPL 2 åå¸çãæä»¬è®¾è®¡äº GNU GPL 3 æ¥é²æ¢è¿æ ·åã"
-#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The criteria for open source are concerned solely with the licensing of the "
-"source code. Thus, these nonfree executables, when made from source code "
-"such as Linux that is open source and free, are open source but not free."
-msgstr ""
-"å¼æºçæ å没ææè¯å°è¿ä¸ªé®é¢ï¼å®ä»¬åªå
³å¿æºä»£ç
ç许å¯è¯ãè¿æ ·ä»¥æ¥ï¼è¿äºç¼è¯èª"
-"诸å¦Linuxçå¼æºåèªç±è½¯ä»¶çå¯æ§è¡æ件ï¼åå°æªå¨ï¼æ¯å¼æºçï¼ä½ä¸æ¯èªç±çã"
-
#. type: Content of: <div><h3>
msgid ""
"Common Misunderstandings of “Free Software” and “Open "