[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point.... |
|
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:28:06 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 12/12/29 23:28:05
Modified files:
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pot
open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.39&r2=1.40
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.18&r2=1.19
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.11&r2=1.12
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 19 May 2012 01:31:17 -0000 1.37
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.38
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-07-02 06:57+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Hossam Hossny <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic\n"
@@ -142,20 +142,51 @@
"Ù
ث٠بÙاء برÙ
جÙات ÙÙÙØ© ÙÙ
ÙØ«ÙÙØ©. Ù
عظÙ
داعÙ
Ù
اÙÙ
صادر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ© ÙصÙÙا Ø¥ÙÙÙا ÙÙذا "
"اÙØ³Ø¨Ø¨Ø ÙÙذا اÙربط Ù٠اÙØ°Ù ÙعترÙÙ٠ب٠ÙÙØ·."
-# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"تÙرÙبا Ù٠اÙÙ
صادر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ© ØØ±Ø©Ø ÙÙÙا اÙÙ
صطÙØÙÙ ÙصÙا٠تÙرÙبا ÙÙس Ùئة "
"اÙبرÙ
جÙات. ÙÙÙÙÙ
ا ÙستÙدا٠إÙÙ ÙÙÙ
Ù
ختÙÙØ©
تÙ
اÙ
ا. تشÙ٠اÙÙ
صادر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ© "
@@ -169,13 +200,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"&rdquo;اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة&ldquo;. &rdquo;اÙÙ
صادر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ©&"
"ldquo;. إذا ÙاÙت ÙÙس اÙبرÙ
جÙØ§ØªØ Ø£ÙÙÙ
أ٠اسÙ
Ù
تستخدÙ
Ø ÙعÙ
Ø Ùأ٠اÙÙÙÙ
ات "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 19 May 2012 01:31:17 -0000 1.18
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.19
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-28 14:55+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Yavor Doganov <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Bulgarian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -165,20 +165,51 @@
"моÑен и надежден ÑоÑÑÑеÑ. ÐовеÑеÑо оÑ
поддÑÑжниÑиÑе на оÑвоÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð´ оÑе "
"оÑÑогава Ð¸Ð¼Ð°Ñ Ñова пÑедвид и пÑавÑÑ
ÑÑÑаÑа аÑоÑиаÑиÑ."
-# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"ÐоÑÑи вÑеки ÑоÑÑÑÐµÑ Ñ Ð¾ÑвоÑен код е
Ñвободен ÑоÑÑÑеÑ. ÐвеÑе понÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¾Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ²Ð°Ñ "
"поÑÑи една и ÑÑÑа каÑегоÑÐ¸Ñ ÑоÑÑÑеÑ, но Ñе
ÑÑоÑÑ Ð·Ð°Ð´ вÑзгледи, базиÑани на "
@@ -195,13 +226,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"âСвободен ÑоÑÑÑеÑâ, ÑоÑÑÑÐµÑ Ñ âоÑвоÑен
кодâ. Ðко Ñова е един и ÑÑÑ ÑоÑÑÑеÑ, "
"има ли знаÑение какво име използваÑе? Ðа,
заÑоÑо ÑазлиÑниÑе дÑми вÑплÑÑÐ°Ð²Ð°Ñ "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 3 Jul 2012 16:49:26 -0000 1.24
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.25
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-06-21 17:38+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Joerg Kohne <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -152,17 +153,48 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Nahezu jede Open-Source-Software (<dfn title=\"Open Source Software\">OSS</"
"dfn>) ist Freie Software. Die beiden Begriffe beschreiben fast die gleiche "
@@ -179,13 +211,22 @@
"Software."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"<em>Freie Software</em>. <em>Open Source</em>. Wenn es dieselbe Software "
"ist, ist es wichtig, welchen Namen man verwendet? Ja, denn verschiedene "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 9 Nov 2012 01:26:16 -0000 1.42
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.43
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.es\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-01-06 19:19+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Xavier Reina <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -159,20 +160,63 @@
"simpatizantes del «código abierto» llegaron al movimiento después de "
"entonces y lo asocian del mismo modo."
-# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | [-Nearly all open source software is free software.-]The two terms
+# | describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views
+# | based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development
+# | methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software
+# | movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only free
+# | software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
+# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
+# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
+# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
+# | problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
+# | software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and
+# | move to free software.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Casi todo el software de código abierto es software libre. Los dos conceptos
"
"describen casi la misma categorÃa de software, pero representan puntos de "
@@ -189,13 +233,29 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | “Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same
+# | [-software,-] {+software (or nearly so),+} does it matter which name you
+# | use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free
+# | program by any other name would give you the same freedom today,
+# | establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people
+# | to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak
+# | of “free software.”
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"«Software libre». «Código abierto». Si es el mismo software, ¿importa
acaso "
"qué nombre se utiliza?. SÃ, porque las diferentes palabras expresan ideas "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 19 May 2012 01:31:18 -0000 1.24
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.25
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-01-16 23:22+0330\n"
"Last-Translator: Mahyar Moghimi <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Persian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -163,6 +163,25 @@
"Ù Ùاب٠اطÙ
ÛÙا٠. اکثر ØاÙ
Ûا٠”Ù
تÙâباز“ بعد از پدÛد Ø¢Ù
د٠ÚÙÛÙ "
"دÛدگاÙÛ Ø¨Ù Ø¢Ù Ù¾ÛÙستÙâاÙد ٠آÙâÙا ÙÙ
ÙÙ
اÙ
رÙتار را دارÙد."
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
# type: Content of: <p>
# msgid ""
# "Nearly all open source software is free software; the two terms describe "
@@ -177,18 +196,30 @@
# "however, non-free software is a social problem, and moving to free "
# "software is the solution."
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"تÙرÛبا تÙ
اÙ
ÙرÙ
âاÙزارÙØ§Û Ù
تÙâباز ÛÚ© ÙرÙ
âاÙزار آزاد ÙÛز Ù
ØسÙب Ù
ÛâØ´ÙÙØ¯Ø Ùر د٠"
"عبارت تÙرÛبا ÛÚ© دست٠از ÙرÙ
âاÙزارÙا را
تÙصÛÙ Ù
ÛâÚ©ÙÙØ¯Ø ÙÙÛ Ù¾Ø§ÛÙâÛ Ø¢ÙâÙا بر "
@@ -203,13 +234,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"“ÙرÙ
âاÙزار آزاد” “Ù
ت٠باز” اگر
Ùرد٠ÛÚ© ÙرÙ
âاÙزار "
"باشÙØ¯Ø Ø¢Ûا اÙÙ
ÛØªÛ Ø¯Ø§Ø±Ø¯ Ú©Ù ÚÙ ÙاÙ
Û Ø¨Ù Ø¢Ù
بدÙÛÙ
Ø Ø¨ÙÙØ Úرا Ú©Ù Ú©ÙÙ
ات Ù
تÙاÙت "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -b -r1.39 -r1.40
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 26 Oct 2012 22:58:47 -0000 1.39
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.40
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-10-26 22:49+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -162,17 +163,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | [-Nearly all open source software is free software.-]The two terms
+# | describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views
+# | based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development
+# | methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software
+# | movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only free
+# | software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
+# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
+# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
+# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
+# | problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
+# | software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and
+# | move to free software.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Presque tous les logiciels open source sont des logiciels libres ; les deux "
"termes décrivent à peu près la même catégorie de logiciel, mais ils "
@@ -188,13 +232,29 @@
"abandonner et migrer vers les logiciels libres est la solution."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | “Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same
+# | [-software,-] {+software (or nearly so),+} does it matter which name you
+# | use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free
+# | program by any other name would give you the same freedom today,
+# | establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people
+# | to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak
+# | of “free software.”
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"« Logiciel libre ». « Open source ». Si ce sont les mêmes logiciels,
le nom "
"utilisé pour les qualifier est-il important ? Oui, parce que des mots "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 19 May 2012 01:31:18 -0000 1.12
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.13
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-07-23 11:37+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -156,17 +157,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | [-Nearly all open source software is free software.-]The two terms
+# | describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views
+# | based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development
+# | methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software
+# | movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only free
+# | software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
+# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
+# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
+# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
+# | problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
+# | software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and
+# | move to free software.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Quasi tutto il software open source è software libero; i due termini "
"descrivono all'incirca la stessa categoria di software. Ma si basano su "
@@ -181,13 +225,29 @@
"software libero. "
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | “Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same
+# | [-software,-] {+software (or nearly so),+} does it matter which name you
+# | use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free
+# | program by any other name would give you the same freedom today,
+# | establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people
+# | to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak
+# | of “free software.”
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"Software libero. Open source. Se si tratta dello stesso software, ha "
"importanza quale nome venga utilizzato? Sì, perché parole differenti
portano "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 12 Jun 2012 08:39:48 -0000 1.4
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.5
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-02-22 10:52+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -144,17 +145,48 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"ã»ã¨ãã©ãã¹ã¦ã®ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã»ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã¯èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã§ããäºã¤ã®ç¨"
"èªã¯ã»ã¨ãã©åãã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®åé¡ãè¿°ã¹ã¾ãããåºæ¬çã«ç°ãªã£ã価å¤ã«ãã¨ã¥"
@@ -168,13 +200,22 @@
"ã¨ãæ¢ãã¦èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã«ç§»ããã¨ã§ãã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"ãèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ããããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ããããããããåãã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ãªã"
"ã°ãã©ã¡ãã®ååã使ãããåé¡ãªã®ã§ãããããåé¡ãªã®ã§ãããªããªãç°ãªãè¨"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 16 Sep 2012 09:25:10 -0000 1.22
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.23
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html 1\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-07-13 08:18+0530\n"
"Last-Translator: Shyam Karanattu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Swathanthra Malayalam Computing <address@hidden"
@@ -155,20 +155,51 @@
"പറയàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´¯à´¿. à´à´àµà´àµà´®à´¿à´àµà´
“à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ”
à´ªàµà´°à´µà´°àµâà´¤àµà´¤à´à´°àµà´ à´
à´àµà´à´¿à´¨àµà´¯à´¾à´£àµàµ
à´àµà´¯àµà´¤à´¤àµàµ. "
"à´
à´¤àµà´àµà´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ തനàµà´¨àµ
“à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ ” à´
à´àµà´à´¿à´¨àµ
à´à´°àµ à´à´¶à´¯à´¤àµà´¤àµ
à´ªàµà´°à´¤à´¿à´¨à´¿à´§àµà´à´°à´¿à´àµà´àµ."
-# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"à´à´¤à´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ à´à´²àµà´²à´¾ à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ
à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±àµà´
à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¾à´£àµàµ. à´°à´£àµà´àµàµ
പദà´àµà´à´³àµà´ à´à´¤à´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ à´à´°àµ "
"à´à´£à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´²àµà´³àµà´³
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿à´¨àµ
à´àµà´±à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´£àµàµ പറയàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµà´.
à´ªà´àµà´·àµ à´
à´à´¿à´¸àµà´¥à´¾à´¨à´ªà´°à´®à´¾à´¯à´¿
à´µàµà´¯à´¤àµà´¯à´¸àµà´¤à´®à´¾à´¯ à´à´¶à´àµà´à´³àµ "
@@ -183,13 +214,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"“à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´°àµâ”.
“à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ”.
à´à´µà´°à´£àµà´àµà´ à´à´°àµ "
"à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿à´¨àµ പറàµà´±à´¿
പറയàµà´¨àµà´¨àµ. പിനàµà´¨àµ à´à´¤àµ
à´ªàµà´°àµà´ªà´¯àµà´à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´²àµà´
à´àµà´´à´ªàµà´ªà´®àµà´£àµà´àµ? à´à´£àµà´àµàµ. à´à´¾à´°à´£à´,
à´µàµà´¯à´¤àµà´¯à´¸àµà´¤ "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 25 Dec 2012 13:46:28 -0000 1.2
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:04 -0000 1.3
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Tom Uijldert <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: \n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -149,17 +150,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | [-Nearly all open source software is free software.-]The two terms
+# | describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views
+# | based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development
+# | methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software
+# | movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only free
+# | software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
+# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
+# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
+# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
+# | problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
+# | software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and
+# | move to free software.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Bijna alle open bron software is ook vrije software; de benamingen duiden "
"bijna dezelfde categorie. Ze zijn echter gebaseerd op verschillende "
@@ -173,13 +217,29 @@
"software de oplossing."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | “Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same
+# | [-software,-] {+software (or nearly so),+} does it matter which name you
+# | use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free
+# | program by any other name would give you the same freedom today,
+# | establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people
+# | to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak
+# | of “free software.”
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"“Vrije software”. “Open bron”. Het is dezelfde "
"software, maakt het uit welke benaming je gebruikt? Jazeker, want ze "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 19 May 2012 01:31:18 -0000 1.19
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000 1.20
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-06-17 10:19-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n==1 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 "
"|| n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
"X-Generator: Virtaal 0.7.0\n"
@@ -168,20 +169,63 @@
"siÄ do tego Årodowiska od tamtego czasu i myÅlÄ
tylko o
tych "
"praktycznych wartoÅciach."
-# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | [-Nearly all open source software is free software.-]The two terms
+# | describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views
+# | based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development
+# | methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software
+# | movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only free
+# | software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
+# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
+# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
+# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
+# | problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
+# | software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and
+# | move to free software.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Prawie caÅe otwarte oprogramowanie jest wolnym oprogramowaniem. Te dwa "
"okreÅlenia opisujÄ
niemalże te same kategorie oprogramowania, lecz "
@@ -199,13 +243,29 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | “Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same
+# | [-software,-] {+software (or nearly so),+} does it matter which name you
+# | use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free
+# | program by any other name would give you the same freedom today,
+# | establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people
+# | to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak
+# | of “free software.”
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"„Wolne oprogramowanie.” „Otwarte oprogramowanie.” "
"Jeżeli jest to to samo oprogramowanie, czy robi różnicÄ, którÄ
"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.18
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -b -r1.18 -r1.19
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pot 16 Sep 2012 05:29:33 -0000 1.18
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pot 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000 1.19
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -99,27 +99,46 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices "
+"“tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” "
+"after the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are "
+"not free software even though their source code is free software. The open "
+"source supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern "
+"is limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software "
+"“better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+"software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For the "
+"free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social problem, and "
+"the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free "
+"software.”"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 30 May 2012 00:29:33 -0000
1.2
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000
1.3
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-05-29 15:01-0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafael Beraldo <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -150,17 +151,48 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Quase todo software de código aberto é software livre. Os dois termos "
"descrevem quase a mesma categoria de software, porém eles apoiam visões "
@@ -176,13 +208,22 @@
"livre."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"âSoftware livreâ. âCódigo abertoâ. Se é o mesmo software, realmente
importa "
"que nome você usa? Sim, porque palavras diferentes exprimem ideias "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 19 May 2012 01:31:18 -0000 1.8
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000 1.9
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.ro.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-08-27 20:00+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: CÄtÄlin Frâncu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -149,17 +149,48 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Aproape tot software-ul cu sursÄ deschisÄ este software liber. Cei doi "
"termeni descriu aproape aceeaÈi categorie de software, dar reprezintÄ
puncte "
@@ -175,13 +206,22 @@
"Èi sÄ migrÄm la software liber."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"âSoftware liberâ. âSursÄ deschisÄâ. DacÄ este acelaÈi software,
conteazÄ ce "
"nume folosiÈi? Da, deoarece cuvinte diferite comunicÄ idei diferite. DeÈi
un "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 26 Mar 2012 16:41:05 -0000 1.24
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000 1.25
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2011-09-20 12:30-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-06-14 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -164,17 +165,60 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | [-Nearly all open source software is free software.-]The two terms
+# | describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views
+# | based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development
+# | methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software
+# | movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only free
+# | software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
+# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
+# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
+# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
+# | problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree
+# | software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and
+# | move to free software.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"ÐоÑÑи вÑе пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ c оÑкÑÑÑÑм иÑÑ
однÑм
ÑекÑÑом ÑвлÑÑÑÑÑ \n"
"ÑвободнÑми пÑогÑаммами. Ðба ÑеÑмина
опиÑÑваÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑи Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð¸ ÑÑ Ð¶Ðµ \n"
@@ -194,13 +238,29 @@
"и пеÑейÑи на ÑвободнÑе пÑогÑаммÑ."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | “Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same
+# | [-software,-] {+software (or nearly so),+} does it matter which name you
+# | use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free
+# | program by any other name would give you the same freedom today,
+# | establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people
+# | to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak
+# | of “free software.”
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"“Ð¡Ð²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ð°Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑамма”. “ÐÑкÑÑÑÑй
иÑÑ
однÑй ÑекÑÑ”. "
"ÐÑли ÑÑо одна и Ñа же пÑогÑамма, Ñазве
Ð¸Ð¼ÐµÐµÑ Ð·Ð½Ð°Ñение, каким из двÑÑ
"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 18 Dec 2012 12:56:39 -0000 1.9
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000 1.10
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-12-18 14:44+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -148,17 +149,48 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Thuajse krejt software-i me burim të hapur është software i lirë. Dy
termat "
"përshkruajnë pothuajse të njëjtën kategori software-i, por mbrojnë
pikëpamje "
@@ -174,13 +206,22 @@
"reshtet përdorimi i tij dhe të kalohet te software-i i lirë."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"“Software i lirë.” “Burim i hapur.” Nëse bëhet
fjalë "
"për të njëjtin program, ka rëndësi cilin emër përdorni? Po, ngaqë
fjalë të "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -b -r1.11 -r1.12
--- open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 19 May 2012 01:31:18 -0000 1.11
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000 1.12
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-05-16 16:54+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Tahir Emre Kalaycı <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -164,20 +164,51 @@
"pratik deÄerler arasında güçlü, güvenilir yazılım yapmak gibi Åeyler
vardı. "
"Açık kaynaÄın çoÄu destekçisi bu duruma geldi, ve aynı iliÅkiyi
yaptılar."
-# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"Neredeyse tüm açık kaynak yazılımlar özgür yazılımdır. İki terim
neredeyse "
"yazılımın aynı kategorisini tanımlamaktadır, ancak temel olarak farklı
"
@@ -193,13 +224,22 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"\"Ãzgür yazılım\" \"Açık kaynak\". EÄer ikisi aynı yazılımsa, hangi
ismi "
"kullandıÄımızın bir önemi var mıdır? Evet, çünkü farklı kelimeler
farklı "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 19 May 2012 01:31:19 -0000
1.9
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 29 Dec 2012 23:28:05 -0000
1.10
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 1.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-05-18 20:31-0300\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-02-15 16:54+0800\n"
"Last-Translator: Nan Deng <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese (simplified)\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"Outdated-Since: 2012-12-29 18:25-0500\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -131,17 +132,48 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
-"almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
-"fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; "
-"free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free "
-"software is an ethical imperative, because only free software respects the "
-"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
-"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
-"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
-"practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however, nonfree "
-"software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move "
-"to free software."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
+"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
+"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
+"they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately those licenses are not "
+"used on many programs. Second, and more importantly, many computers "
+"(including many Android devices) contain executable programs that "
+"correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow the "
+"user to install modified versions of those executables, but one special "
+"company has the power to do so modify them. We call these devices “"
+"tyrants”, and the practice is called “tivoization” after "
+"the product where we first saw the practice. These executables are not free "
+"software even though their source code is free software. The open source "
+"supporters do not concern themselves with this issue; their concern is "
+"limited to the llicense of the source code."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Nearly all open source software is free software. The two terms describe "
+#| "almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on "
+#| "fundamentally different values. Open source is a development "
+#| "methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software "
+#| "movement, free software is an ethical imperative, because only free "
+#| "software respects the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of "
+#| "open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
+"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
+"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
+"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
+"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
+"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
+"solution to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, "
+"however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop "
+"using it and move to free software."
msgstr ""
"å纯说起软件çè¯ï¼é£ä¹å
ä¹ææçå¼æºè½¯ä»¶åæ¶ä¹æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶ãå¼æºè½¯ä»¶åèªç±è½¯ä»¶"
"è¿ä¸¤ä¸ªè¯å¨å¾å¤§ç¨åº¦ä¸æè¿°çæ¯åä¸ç±»è½¯ä»¶ï¼ä½æ¯å®ä»¬æåºäºçä»·å¼è§å´æçæ¬è´¨ä¸ç"
@@ -152,13 +184,22 @@
"å°±æ¯ä¸ä¸ªç¤¾ä¼é®é¢ã解å³çæ¹æ¡ååªè½æ¯æå¼éèªç±è½¯ä»¶ï¼è½¬æèªç±è½¯ä»¶ã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
+#| "software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
+#| "convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would "
+#| "give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way "
+#| "depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to "
+#| "help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
msgid ""
"“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
-"software, does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words "
-"convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give "
-"you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends "
-"above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, "
-"it is essential to speak of “free software.”"
+"software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
+"different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other "
+"name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a "
+"lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you "
+"want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software."
+"”"
msgstr ""
"“èªç±è½¯ä»¶”３å¼æºè½¯ä»¶”ï¼æ¢ç¶é½æçæ¯å类软件ï¼é£ä½å¿
"
"å¨ååä¸è¿ä¹è¾çå¢ï¼ææè¿æ¯æè¿ä¸ªå¿
è¦çãå
为ä¸åçè¯æ±ä¼ éçä¸åçæç»´ãå°½"
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/09
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/09
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/09
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/18
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Besnik Bleta, 2012/12/18
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Tom Uijldert, 2012/12/25
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....,
GNUN <=
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., NIIBE Yutaka, 2012/12/29
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Dora Scilipoti, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Pavel Kharitonov, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Dora Scilipoti, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., GNUN, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Pavel Kharitonov, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Dora Scilipoti, 2012/12/30
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point...., Pavel Kharitonov, 2012/12/30