[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?

From: Thomas Preud'homme
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:07:34 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )

Le mardi 30 avril 2013 18:53:31, Daniel Glöckner a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:43:03PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > As I already said privately, I'm fine with BSD-2-clause.
> Does that mean you prefer it over the LGPL?
> What about you, grischka? Which one do you prefer?

Mmmmh. Overall I'm more a (A|L)GPL guy but I choose different license for 
different project. For tcc I thought it could make sense since we have only 
libtcc has static lib and many people seem to build stuff around it.

>   Daniel

Best regards,


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]