[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?

From: KHMan
Subject: Re: [Tinycc-devel] Do we want a BSD license for tinycc?
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 11:54:54 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5

On 5/1/2013 9:51 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
On 04/30/2013 11:53:31 AM, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:43:03PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> As I already said privately, I'm fine with BSD-2-clause.

Does that mean you prefer it over the LGPL?


What about you, grischka? Which one do you prefer?

Why on earth would that matter?

I identified a dozen people I have to talk to just to get a clean
version of the code in _my_ fork. You guys have been doing a "mob"
branch for years, with random drive-by commits from people you
don't even know, who have zero ongoing relationship with the project.

What makes you think you _can_ relicense your version?

I agree with Rob. Too many large and small contribs to be casually discussing about relicensing...

Kein-Hong Man (esq.)
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]