[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature
From: |
norm |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2012 08:51:23 -0700 |
Jon Steinhart <address@hidden> writes:
>Attach was "implemented as part of whatnow" because that seemed to be the place
>to put it for one who uses comp/repl/forw/etc. like I do and I implemented it.
>It couldn't be done as a shell command combined with the above because that
>would have meant you'd have to leave the editor, suspend whatnow, run an attach
>command, resume whatnow, and then send. Cumbersome to say the least.
Of historical interest:
Whatnow now has features not available to shell users. This represents, the
perhaps inevitable, denouement of an argument I lost decades ago. I believed
then, and believe now, that the whatnow feature was a mistake; that the correct
interface between mh and the user is the shell.
It's surprising that it took thirty five years.
Norman Shapiro
- [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, norm, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Ken Hornstein, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Jon Steinhart, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, norm, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Ken Hornstein, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Paul Fox, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, norm, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Jon Steinhart, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature,
norm <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Jon Steinhart, 2012/09/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Ken Hornstein, 2012/09/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Jon Steinhart, 2012/09/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Ralph Corderoy, 2012/09/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Ken Hornstein, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, norm, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] The attach feature, Jon Steinhart, 2012/09/11