|
From: | Marc Hohl |
Subject: | Re: Issue 37 - new work |
Date: | Sat, 29 Jan 2011 16:50:37 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Am 29.01.2011 09:50, schrieb David Kastrup:
The comparison between LaTeX and LilyPond was not meant to be 1:1, of course.Marc Hohl<address@hidden> writes:If this is done similar to LaTeX packages where you can enable the option "draft" to speed up compiling, and if everything looks ok, you remove the draft and that's it, then this would be not too confusing for users.draft Mode in LaTeX omits details but does not change the layout or pagebreaking.
The point here was that IMHO most LaTeX users understand what "draft" means, so it would not be too confusing to add certain levels of processing stages. On the other hand, I agree with you that LilyPond should simply do the best job without the need to fuzz around with optimization stages and whatnot. Human engravers didn't have a "draft" mode either ;-) Regards, Marc
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |