[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue 37 - new work
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Issue 37 - new work |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:15:45 -0200 |
pressed send too soon.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Mike Solomon <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> I cooked up this musical example that shows both responses to upward and
>> downward pressure to give you an idea of where I'm coming from.
>>
>> Is there a way to get this type of collision avoidance w/o a 2nd quanting
>> pass?
>
> You are now dramatically extending the problem scope: you are looking
> for a configuration that optimizes configurations of all beams at the
> same time. For example, it is conceivable that individually, the beam
> for A below staff would be better served when the beam goes up the
> line of D''. However, that would leave no room for the A' beam, since
> it would be on top of the A'' beam.
>
> A solution that would work for this should optimize all of the beams
> at the same time. It might be feasible to code, but probably only if
> you restrict all the beams to be
horizontal. The tie formatting is similar: it also tries to find a
configuration where *all* ties between a chord are more or less OK.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, (continued)
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, Marc Hohl, 2011/01/29
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, David Kastrup, 2011/01/29
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, Marc Hohl, 2011/01/29
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, address@hidden, 2011/01/29
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, Bernard Hurley, 2011/01/29
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, David Kastrup, 2011/01/29
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2011/01/28
- Re: Issue 37 - new work,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/28
- Re: Issue 37 - new work, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/28