[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: critical issues
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: critical issues |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:10:49 +0100 (CET) |
> Look, we simply *cannot* offer users anything that would be
> "reasonable" by most standards. We have "highly embarrassing" bugs
> from 2006 that we're not even *pretending* to be working on. We've
> been in "release crunch" mode for at least six months. The only
> glimmer of hope on the horizon is that, under the most strict
> interpretation of "critical regression", almost none of those bugs
> were introduced recently. So there's a chance that once we "catch
> up" on the old critical regressions, we won't have many new ones,
> and thus we can move forward with a stable foundation.
What we would need is a payed full-time developer. However, this is
expensive. Assuming that the programmer has a family with children,
an appartment, etc., and to provide a reasonably good living for him
or her, this would be about 3000 Euros a month here in Austria or
Germany (one third of the amount would immediately vanish as taxes and
social security payments).
But maybe there is a group of LilyPond philanthropists who can afford
this and are willing to do so...
Werner
Re: critical issues, Jan WarchoĊ, 2011/01/01
Re: critical issues, Trevor Daniels, 2011/01/01