[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm
From: |
Carl D. Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question) |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:40:24 -0600 |
On 6/24/09 10:36 AM, "Mark Polesky" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>>> (eq? (split-at-predicate odd? '(2 3 6 8 9 0))
>>>> '((2) (6 8) (0)))
>>>>
>>>> holds. It would be .ly file that runs Scheme function on a
>>>> set of inputs, and compares them to a set of outputs to make
>>>> sure that they match.
>>>
>>> I second that, but would advice to have a small google before
>>> rolling your own again. Eg
>>> http://web.mit.edu/~axch/www/testing.html
>>>
>>> If you start adding micro tests, it is nice if you get decent
>>> reports when something breaks.
>>
>> GUILE comes with its own testing framework for testing GUILE
>> itself, but I am not sure if they export the functionality.
>
> I *am* interested in helping with this, but could someone apply my
> final patch on this?
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00528.html
>
> It's been almost a month since I started with this...
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05/msg00515.html
> ...and I think I have the approval of everyone by now. (:
I'd be happy to apply a patch, but I have no idea where the status is.
Can you roll a new patch relative to origin/master?
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question),
Carl D. Sorensen <=
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24