[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question) |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:36:24 -0700 (PDT) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> >> (eq? (split-at-predicate odd? '(2 3 6 8 9 0))
> >> '((2) (6 8) (0)))
> >>
> >> holds. It would be .ly file that runs Scheme function on a
> >> set of inputs, and compares them to a set of outputs to make
> >> sure that they match.
> >
> > I second that, but would advice to have a small google before
> > rolling your own again. Eg
> > http://web.mit.edu/~axch/www/testing.html
> >
> > If you start adding micro tests, it is nice if you get decent
> > reports when something breaks.
>
> GUILE comes with its own testing framework for testing GUILE
> itself, but I am not sure if they export the functionality.
I *am* interested in helping with this, but could someone apply my
final patch on this?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-06/msg00528.html
It's been almost a month since I started with this...
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-05/msg00515.html
...and I think I have the approval of everyone by now. (:
Thanks.
- Mark
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question),
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24