[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question) |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:12:30 -0700 (PDT) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > I also took a look at the next procedure,
> > split-list-by-separator. My revised version is below. Unless I
> > hear otherwise, I'll send a patch soon.
>
> Maybe you guys can look into making a test framework for the
> Scheme library functions.
>
> It should be fairly simple to check the functions (like you do
> here ad-hoc) in a separate .scm file that is loaded if you run
> ly/test-scm-functions.ly or something similar.
Han-Wen,
I don't mean to be obtuse, but I don't quite understand what you
mean. What's a test framework? Do you mean "library" as in
lily-library, or SRFI library? By check, do you mean test/compare
results, or access, as in checkout?
Is it the define-public that bothers you? Sorry for being so
confused. But I do want to understand you clearly before I go out
on a limb, er... branch.
Thanks.
- Mark
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/14
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Joe Neeman, 2009/06/15
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jay Anderson, 2009/06/17
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/17
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jay Anderson, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question),
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24