[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question) |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:48:53 -0700 (PDT) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I mean to have an automated set of tests, that checks for example that
>
> (eq? (split-at-predicate odd? '(2 3 6 8 9 0))
> '((2) (6 8) (0)))
>
> holds. It would be .ly file that runs Scheme function on a set of
> inputs, and compares them to a set of outputs to make sure that they
> match.
Oh, I see, kind of like regression tests for scheme functions? But
there are a *lot* of scheme functions in the source... any priorities?
I'm thinking lily-library.scm and c++.scm. What files/functions were
you thinking about? That might be within my means as a Little Schemer.
Happy to help.
- Mark
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jay Anderson, 2009/06/17
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/17
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/22
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jay Anderson, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/23
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question),
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/24
- Re: [PATCH] Make some local functions public (was: Re: lily-library.scm question), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/24