[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?
From: |
Patrick McCarty |
Subject: |
Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:13:14 -0700 |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Neil Puttock<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Since the Dynamic_engraver is no longer used due to being replaced
> just over a year ago, I'd like to remove it completely.
>
> Any objections?
Was this taken care of?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-05/msg00122.html
I don't know what callbacks needed to be changed, so I figured I would ask.
Thanks,
Patrick
- Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/23
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?,
Patrick McCarty <=
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Mark Polesky, 2009/06/28
- Re: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?, Neil Puttock, 2009/06/29
- type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Mark Polesky, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1 (was: Time to retire Dynamic_engraver?), Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/06/29
- Re: type-check list in NR 6.1.1, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/06/30