[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd status
|
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
|
Subject: |
Re: Hurd status |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 20:12:02 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/4.6 beta3 (Linux/2.6.34-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.5.86; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday 29 December 2010 19:53:17 Parantapa Bhattacharya wrote:
> Hi
>
> >> BTW, we are not trying to create a perfect kernel (well, most of us
> >> aren't :-) ) -- just something that is superior to current mainstream
> >> kernels in certain regards.
>
> Have these aspects been decided and fixed ?
See the heading of http://hurd.gnu.org → mission statement of the Hurd :)
We have Olaf/Antrik to thank for that!
Best wishes,
Arne
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Viengoos still active?, Dok Sander, 2010/12/05
- Re: Viengoos still active?, Neal H. Walfield, 2010/12/05
- Re: Viengoos still active?, Oz, 2010/12/07
- Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), olafBuddenhagen, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), Oz, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), Bjartur Thorlacius, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), William ML Leslie, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/12/28
- Re: Hurd status, Oz, 2010/12/29
- Re: Hurd status, Parantapa Bhattacharya, 2010/12/30
- Re: Hurd status,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
- Re: Hurd status, Oz, 2010/12/31